Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

07:04
Virtual Reality Tools for Assessing Unilateral Spatial Neglect: A Novel Opportunity for Data Collection
Published on: March 10, 2021
4.7K
Social priming of hemispatial neglect affects spatial coding: Evidence from the Simon task
Isabel Arend1, Daniela Aisenberg1, Avishai Henik1
1Department of Psychology and the Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Consciousness and Cognition
|August 21, 2016
Summary
The Simon effect (SE), an indicator of automatic spatial processing, is reduced in individuals with hemispatial neglect (HN). This suggests cognitive state, not just task-irrelevant stimuli, influences spatial coding.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Experimental Psychology
Background:
- The Simon effect (SE) demonstrates automatic spatial processing, where response times are faster when stimulus location matches response location.
- Previous research shows social priming can influence automatic processing, such as in the Stroop effect.
- The automaticity of spatial processing in the SE is often assumed to be independent of higher-level cognitive states.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if an observer's mental state can affect spatial coding as measured by the Simon effect.
- To explore the influence of specific cognitive impairments, hemispatial neglect (HN) and achromatopsia (ACHM), on the SE.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted using social priming manipulations designed to mimic impairments.
- Participants underwent manipulations related to spatial processing (hemispatial neglect) and color perception (achromatopsia).
- The Simon effect was measured in each condition to assess changes in spatial coding.
Main Results:
- The Simon effect was significantly reduced in the "neglected" visual field under the hemispatial neglect manipulation.
- No significant reduction in the Simon effect was observed under the achromatopsia manipulation.
- These findings indicate that spatial coding is influenced by cognitive state.
Conclusions:
- Spatial coding, as measured by the SE, is sensitive to spatial representations influenced by the observer's cognitive state.
- The results challenge stimulus-response interference models that rely on the inherent automaticity of spatial processing.
- Cognitive states can modulate automatic spatial processing, indicating a more complex interaction than previously assumed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Visual Agnosia
1.6K
Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round...
1.6K
Lateralization
1.2K
Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
1.2K

