Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

100.6K
The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
100.6K
DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

21.9K
Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
21.9K
Sanger Sequencing01:57

Sanger Sequencing

777.3K
DNA sequencing is a fundamental technique that is routinely used in the biological sciences. This method can be applied to a range of questions at different scales - from the sequencing of a cloned DNA fragment or the study of a mutation in a gene up to whole-genome sequencing. However, despite the widespread use of sequencing today, it was not until 1977 that Fredrick Sanger and his collaborators developed the chain-termination method to decode DNA sequences. It relies on the separation of a...
777.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome-wide pervasiveness and localized variation of [Formula: see text]-mer-based genomic signatures in eukaryotes.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Prognostic Value and Sex-Related Differences in Chest Pain in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Prospective Cohort Study Beyond Myocardial Ischemia.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

BarcodeBERT: transformers for biodiversity analyses.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Difference in Diagnostic Accuracy on Common Dermatologic Conditions in Skin of Colour and the Impact of Artificially Processed Images.

Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery·2025
Same author

Life at the extremes: maximally divergent microbes with similar genomic signatures linked to extreme environments.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2025
Same author

[Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension].

Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

23.4K

Additive methods for genomic signatures.

Rallis Karamichalis1, Lila Kari2,3, Stavros Konstantinidis4

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London ON, N6A 5B7, Canada.

BMC Bioinformatics
|August 24, 2016
PubMed
Summary

New additive DNA signatures, including composite and assembled types, can identify species more reliably than traditional Chaos Game Representations (CGR) of nuclear DNA. These methods offer improved genomic signature capabilities, especially for closely related species or when using next-generation sequencing data.

Keywords:
Additive DNA signatureAlignment-freeAssembled DNA signatureChaos Game RepresentationComparative genomicsComposite DNA signatureGenomic signatureInformation distance

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K
Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics
09:40

Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics

Published on: January 25, 2019

9.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations
10:17

An Allele-specific Gene Expression Assay to Test the Functional Basis of Genetic Associations

Published on: November 3, 2010

23.4K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K
Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics
09:40

Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics

Published on: January 25, 2019

9.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Chaos Game Representations (CGR) have been explored as genomic signatures for species identification.
  • Previous studies showed CGRs of nuclear and organellar DNA can differ significantly.
  • While CGRs of mitochondrial DNA showed promise, extensive analysis of nuclear DNA CGRs was lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the efficacy of nuclear DNA CGRs as species-specific genomic signatures.
  • To develop and evaluate novel additive DNA signature methods for improved genomic identification.
  • To address limitations in differentiating closely related species using existing CGR methods.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a large dataset (1.45 Gbp) of nuclear DNA (nDNA) from 42 diverse organisms.
  • Computational experiments comparing CGR signatures of nDNA from different species.
  • Development and testing of composite DNA signatures (combining nDNA and organellar DNA).
  • Development and testing of assembled DNA signatures (using short DNA subfragments).

Main Results:

  • CGR signatures of nDNA could not always differentiate between species, especially closely related ones.
  • Composite DNA signatures successfully differentiated all tested organisms, including cases where nDNA CGRs failed.
  • Assembled DNA signatures demonstrated comparable distinguishing power to conventional CGRs but used shorter sequences.

Conclusions:

  • Additive DNA signatures, such as composite and assembled types, show potential as reliable genomic signatures.
  • These novel signatures can overcome limitations of nDNA CGRs, particularly for closely related species.
  • Additive signatures are applicable to raw next-generation sequencing data and can complement existing identification methods.