Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
ERP Correlates of Simulated Purchase Decisions
Patrick D Gajewski1, Jessica Drizinsky2, Joachim Zülch2
1Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at Technische Universität Dortmund Dortmund, Germany.
Understanding economic decision-making, this study reveals brain activity differences. Counter-conformity choices, like buying expensive items, show distinct electrophysiological patterns compared to typical buying behaviors.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroeconomics
Background:
- Economic decision-making is common, yet its underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear.
- Investigating brain activity during purchasing decisions provides insight into economic behavior.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore electrophysiological brain activity during simulated purchase decisions.
- To differentiate neural correlates of conformity versus counter-conformity economic choices.
Main Methods:
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during simulated product purchases at varying price points.
- Participants made decisions to buy or not buy, including conforming and counter-conforming choices.
- Response times and ERP components (N2, P3a, P3b, r-P3, CNV) were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Counter-conformity decisions (buying high, not buying low) were slower and more variable.
- Enhanced fronto-central N2 and larger response-locked P3 (r-P3) were observed during counter-conformity.
- Conformity decisions showed a larger subsequent contingent negative variation (CNV).
Conclusions:
- Counter-conformity decisions may involve elevated response thresholds (N2) and intensified evaluation (r-P3).
- Reduced preparation for subsequent trials (CNV) is associated with counter-conformity.
- Findings highlight the fronto-parietal cortex's role in complex economic choices.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Cause and Effect
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correlations

