Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.3K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.3K
Hearing01:31

Hearing

58.4K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
58.4K
The Cochlea01:13

The Cochlea

52.2K
The cochlea is a coiled structure in the inner ear that contains hair cells—the sensory receptors of the auditory system. Sound waves are transmitted to the cochlea by small bones attached to the eardrum called the ossicles, which vibrate the oval window that leads to the inner ear. This causes fluid in the chambers of the cochlea to move, vibrating the basilar membrane.
52.2K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.4K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.4K
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

5.9K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
5.9K
Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

8.5K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Phoniatric care for disorders of the professional singing voice].

HNO·2026
Same author

Phonosurgical Treatment of Laryngeal Leukoplakia and Dysplasia: Results of Multidimensional Voice Diagnostics Including the VEM.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Attention decoding at the cocktail party: Preserved in hearing aid users, reduced in cochlear implant users.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

The crux of NPO paradox revealed by increased pneumonia incidence in post-stroke dysphagia patients with dietary restrictions.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Retrospective longitudinal analysis of spectral features reveals divergent vocal development patterns for treble and non-treble singers.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same author

<i>In vivo</i> insights into irregular voice production as a complex nonlinear system-a case study.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2025
Same journal

Integrated multi-assessment and structural performance index framework for stacking-sequence optimisation of natural fibre reinforced laminates.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

SuperiorGAT: graph attention networks for sparse LiDAR point cloud reconstruction in autonomous systems.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

The effect of stretching the pectoralis major, sternocleidomastoid, and iliopsoas muscles on 800 m swimming performance in master swimmers.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

ISNR-PQC: isometry noise resilience post quantum cryptography primitive.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Identification of high-yielding and stable genotypes of barley in the cold climate of Iran using AMMI and GGE biplot models.

Scientific reports·2026
Same journal

Bayesian negative binomial modelling of spatial and temporal patterns of road traffic deaths in Ghana.

Scientific reports·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

918

Understanding music with cochlear implants.

Lisa Bruns1, Dirk Mürbe1, Anja Hahne1

  • 1Saxonian Cochlear Implant Center, Division of Phoniatrics and Audiology, ENT department, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden D-01304, Germany.

Scientific Reports
|August 26, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cochlear implants (CI) help hearing-impaired individuals perceive sound, but music remains challenging. This study explored music discrimination, meaning access, and appreciation in CI users, revealing distinct processing patterns and highlighting differences between post- and prelingually deafened users.

More Related Videos

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

5.2K
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

918
Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

5.2K
Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice
09:06

Cochlear Implant Surgery and Electrically-evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Recordings in C57BL/6 Mice

Published on: January 9, 2019

14.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Music Cognition

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CI) restore sound perception for profoundly hearing-impaired individuals.
  • While language comprehension is often satisfactory, music perception remains a significant challenge for many CI users.
  • Music perception involves multiple dimensions, including discrimination, meaning, and appreciation, which may be differentially affected by CI use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate three key dimensions of music processing: discrimination, access to meaning, and subjective appreciation in cochlear implant (CI) users.
  • To compare music processing abilities between postlingually deafened CI users, prelingually deafened CI users, and a normal-hearing control group.
  • To examine the neural correlates of music meaning processing using event-related potentials (ERPs) and subjective appreciation via questionnaires.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated three music processing dimensions: discrimination, meaning (using N400 ERPs in a music-word priming task), and appreciation (using questionnaires).
  • Compared two groups of adult CI users (postlingually and prelingually deafened) with a matched normal-hearing control group.
  • Analyzed event-related potentials (ERPs) to assess the N400 component as a marker for music meaning access.

Main Results:

  • A double dissociation was observed across the three music processing dimensions in CI users.
  • Both CI user groups showed impaired musical discrimination compared to controls.
  • Music appreciation was reduced only in postlingual CI users, while prelingual CI users lacked the N400 effect, suggesting impaired meaning processing and concept building.

Conclusions:

  • Music processing in CI users is multifaceted, with distinct deficits in discrimination, meaning access, and appreciation depending on the type of deafness.
  • Postlingual CI users may retain or regain some capacity for accessing musical meaning, indicated by the N400 effect.
  • Prelingual deafness and CI use appear to result in more profound and potentially irreversible impairments in music meaning processing and concept formation.