Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Atomic Force Microscopy Cantilever-Based Nanoindentation: Mechanical Property Measurements at the Nanoscale in Air and Fluid
Published on: December 2, 2022
Evaluating fundamental position-dependent differences in wood cell wall adhesion using nanoindentation
Michael Obersriebnig1, Johannes Konnerth1, Wolfgang Gindl-Altmutter1
1Department of Materials Science and Process Engineering, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Science, Konrad Lorenz Strasse 24, A-3430 Tulln, Vienna, Austria.
Polyurethane (PUR) and urea-formaldehyde (UF) adhesives show different wood cell wall adhesion. UF bonds well to fresh surfaces, while PUR adheres better to inner surfaces, influenced by cell wall chemistry.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Wood Science
- Adhesion Science
Background:
- Understanding adhesive-wood interactions is crucial for wood product durability.
- Cell wall structure and chemistry influence adhesive bonding performance.
- Previous studies often lack detailed, position-specific adhesion data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the cell wall adhesion of one-component polyurethane (PUR) and urea-formaldehyde (UF) adhesives on spruce wood.
- To investigate adhesion at two distinct cell wall locations: the inner S3 layer and the freshly cut S2 layer.
- To elucidate the relationship between surface chemistry and adhesive performance.
Main Methods:
- Utilized nanoindentation as a micromechanical assay to quantify adhesive-wood cell wall adhesion.
- Examined adhesion at the interface between adhesive and spruce wood cell wall layers (S2 and S3).
- Employed Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) to characterize the surface polarity of cell wall layers.
Main Results:
- Urea-formaldehyde (UF) exhibited excellent adhesion to freshly cut S2 cell walls but poor adhesion to the inner S3 surface.
- One-component polyurethane (PUR) showed the opposite trend, with better adhesion to the inner S3 surface and weaker adhesion to S2.
- AFM analysis indicated that the inner S3 cell wall surface is less polar than the freshly cut S2 surface.
Conclusions:
- Adhesive performance is highly dependent on the specific wood cell wall surface chemistry and polarity.
- The polarity differences between UF and PUR adhesives likely explain their distinct adhesion behaviors on S2 versus S3 surfaces.
- This study provides novel insights into position-resolved adhesive interactions within the wood cell wall structure.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cell Adhesion in Plants
Pectins are complex heteropolymers mainly composed of negatively-charged α-D-glucopyranosyl uronic acid and some neutral glycosyl residues such as α-L-rhamnopyranose, α-L-arabinofuranose,...
Plant Cell Wall
Role of Microtubules in Cell Wall Deposition

