Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields.

A Heijl1, A Lindgren, G Lindgren

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Lund, Malmö General Hospital, Sweden.

American Journal of Ophthalmology
|August 15, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Female pelvic cancer survivors' experiences of pelvic floor muscle training after pelvic radiotherapy.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2024
Same author

Lumbar puncture for treating acute hydrocephalus after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Journal of the neurological sciences·2023
Same author

Migraine-Associated Common Genetic Variants Confer Greater Risk of Posterior vs. Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke☆.

Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association·2022
Same author

Author Correction: Improving gait classification in horses by using inertial measurement unit (IMU) generated data and machine learning.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Improving gait classification in horses by using inertial measurement unit (IMU) generated data and machine learning.

Scientific reports·2020
Same author

Detailed phenotyping of posterior vs. anterior circulation ischemic stroke: a multi-center MRI study.

Journal of neurology·2019
Same journal

Reply to Comment on "Clinicopathological and Imaging Distinction Between Ocular Adnexal MALT Lymphoma and IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease".

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients With Delayed Follow-Up.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Corneal sensitivity changes and nerve plexus abnormalities in noninfectious anterior uveitis.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Role of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Strabismus, Strabismus Surgery, and Reoperation Rates.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Forging Ahead: The Need for Improved Representation in Academic Ophthalmology.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Clinical Utility of Ultra-Widefield Swept-Source OCT for Intraocular Tumors: Comparison With Ultrasonography, SD-OCT, and MRI.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Test-retest variability in computerized visual fields for glaucoma patients depends on disease severity and location. Understanding these factors aids in distinguishing true glaucoma progression from random measurement variations.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optometry
  • Clinical Vision Science

Background:

  • Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy characterized by visual field loss.
  • Accurate monitoring of glaucoma progression is crucial for timely intervention.
  • Test-retest variability in visual field testing can complicate the assessment of disease progression.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify test-retest variability in computerized visual fields of glaucoma patients.
  • To investigate the influence of visual field defect depth and test point location on variability.
  • To provide insights for differentiating true glaucoma progression from random measurement fluctuations.

Main Methods:

  • Fifty-one patients with glaucoma (varying severity) underwent four computerized visual field tests within four weeks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on threshold variability in relation to defect depth and distance from fixation.
  • Statistical methods were employed to assess the dependence of variability on these factors.

    • Main Results:

    • In areas with moderate visual field loss, variability ranged from normal sensitivity to absolute defect, with minimal dependence on fixation distance.
    • Variability was lower in areas with normal or near-normal sensitivity.
    • The most central visual field locations exhibited the lowest variability.

    Conclusions:

    • Test-retest variability in glaucoma visual fields is influenced by the depth of the defect and the location within the visual field.
    • Considering these factors, along with using more than two tests for comparison, can improve the differentiation between true progression and random variation.
    • Computer-assisted analyses are valuable for managing the complexity of variability in glaucoma monitoring.