Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The case against the case against group studies.

E B Zurif1, H Gardner, H H Brownell

  • 1Brandeis University, Boston, MA.

Brain and Cognition
|July 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Analyzing single patients or groups is less important than forming relevant cognitive theory abstractions. This study questions traditional methods for understanding impaired function and normal cognition, focusing on agrammatism.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Systematic Review of the Needs of Children and Young People of a Parent Diagnosed With Young-Onset-Dementia: Informing a Nursing Intervention.

Journal of advanced nursing·2025
Same author

An in-situ approach for preparing atom probe tomography specimens by xenon plasma-focussed ion beam.

Ultramicroscopy·2019
Same author

The theory of multiple intelligences.

Annals of dyslexia·2013
Same author

Categorizing with overlapping categories.

Memory & cognition·2013
Same author

Canine oral fibrosarcomas: a retrospective analysis of 65 cases (1998-2010).

Veterinary and comparative oncology·2013
Same author

Differential expression of the neu transgene in murine mammary tissues.

International journal of oncology·2011

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psycholinguistics
  • Neurolinguistics

Background:

  • The traditional view posits that only single-patient analyses can reveal normal function from impaired performance.
  • Group studies versus single-case studies have been debated regarding their utility in cognitive research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the exclusive reliance on single-patient analysis for inferring normal function.
  • To reframe the debate from group vs. single case studies to the optimal formation of cognitive theory abstractions.
  • To explore the category of agrammatism within this theoretical context.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of research methodologies in cognitive science.
  • Critique of the group versus single-case study dichotomy.
  • Examination of theoretical abstraction in relation to cognitive function.

Main Results:

  • The dichotomy between group and single-case studies is deemed less productive than focusing on abstraction methods.
  • A shift towards understanding how to form relevant abstractions for cognitive theory is proposed.
  • The category of agrammatism serves as a case study for these methodological considerations.

Conclusions:

  • The focus should be on developing effective methods for abstraction in cognitive research, rather than on the type of case study.
  • Rethinking the approach to studying impaired function can yield more theoretically relevant insights.
  • Agrammatism research can benefit from a focus on theoretical abstraction over methodological debates.

Related Experiment Videos