Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Published on: July 5, 2011
Mid-term results of Copeland shoulder cementless surface replacement arthroplasty from an independent centre
Nicholas Hwang1, Chetan S Modi1, Stephen J Drew1
1Warwick Orthopaedics, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Background:
The present study reports our experience of Copeland shoulder cementless surface replacement arthroplasty (CSRA) and whether glenoid microfracture influences the progression of glenoid erosion.
Methods:
One-hundred-and-twelve CSRAs were performed in 101 patients between 2002 and 2007. Eighty-three patients were alive at the median follow-up time of 72 months (range 9 to 121 months; interquartile range 46 to 93 months). Assessment included an Oxford shoulder score (OSS), patient satisfaction score and plain radiographs.
Results:
The mean (range) OSS was 27 (7 to 48) and 64 of 73 (87.7%) patients were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' with their shoulder. Twenty-three (20.5%) shoulders had over 2 mm of glenoid erosion. Microfracture was performed in 43 of 112 shoulders (38.4%) and did not influence the progression of glenoid erosion. Further surgery was performed in 27 (24.1%) shoulders, including 15 revisions, eight arthrolyses and four subacromial decompressions. Revision to total shoulder arthroplasty was performed in 14 : 10 for glenoid erosion; one each for loosening, periprosthetic fracture, deep infection, and chronic pain. One was revised to reverse arthroplasty for chronic pain.
Conclusions:
CSRA performed in an independent centre reproduces the functional outcomes reported by the designer. Glenoid erosion, however, was a common occurrence and the main cause of revision - microfracture did not influence its progression.

