Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026
Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiac Procedure Testing Prior to Embarking on Large Animal Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
A comparison of apical sealing ability between GuttaFlow and AH plus: An in vitro study
Prajakta Patil1, Vishnu P S Rathore2, Chetan Hotkar3
1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharti Vidyapeeth Dental College, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
Aims:
The present study aimed to compare apical sealing ability between GuttaFlow and AH Plus.
Materials And Method:
Eighty extracted human maxillary anterior teeth with fully formed apex and straight root were collected for this study. The root canals were cleaned and shaped using a standard step back preparation to size 60# master apical file at the established working length and divided into four groups: Group 1, GuttaFlow sealer with gutta-percha; Group 2, AH Plus sealer with gutta-percha; Group 3, positive control group (Teeth were instrumented and left without obturation); Group 4, negative control group (Teeth were totally coated with nail varnish) Dye leakage was carried out. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software and Student's unpaired t-test.
Results:
The GuttaFlow group had a mean leakage of 1.38 mm whereas AH Plus had a mean of 1.425 mm. The standard deviation of GuttaFlow and AH Plus were 0.3861 and 0.3226, respectively. Student's unpaired t-test disclosed no significant difference (P < 0.05) between the groups.
Conclusion:
None of the sealers used in the study could completely seal the apical foramen to have a fluid-tight seal. GuttaFlow and AH Plus showed no statistically significant difference in microleakage; the better result was shown by GuttaFlow.
