Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Yeast As a Chassis for Developing Functional Assays to Study Human P53
Published on: August 4, 2019
The dominant-negative interplay between p53, p63 and p73: A family affair
Olivier Billant1, Alice Léon1, Solenn Le Guellec1
1Inserm UMR 1078, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Faculté de Médecine et des Sciences de la Santé, Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Bretagne, CHRU Brest, Hôpital Morvan, Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Brest, France.
Abstract:
The tumor suppression activity of p53 is frequently impaired in cancers even when a wild-type copy of the gene is still present, suggesting that a dominant-negative effect is exerted by some of p53 mutants and isoforms. p63 and p73, which are related to p53, have also been reported to be subjected to a similar loss of function, suggesting that a dominant-negative interplay might happen between p53, p63 and p73. However, to which extent p53 hotspot mutants and isoforms of p53, p63 and p73 are able to interfere with the tumor suppressive activity of their siblings as well as the underlying mechanisms remain undeciphered. Using yeast, we showed that a dominant-negative effect is widely spread within the p53/p63/p73 family as all p53 loss-of-function hotspot mutants and several of the isoforms of p53 and p73 tested exhibit a dominant-negative potential. In addition, we found that this dominant-negative effect over p53 wild-type is based on tetramer poisoning through the formation of inactive hetero-tetramers and does not rely on a prion-like mechanism contrary to what has been previously suggested. We also showed that mutant p53-R175H gains the ability to inhibit p63 and p73 activity by a mechanism that is only partially based on tetramerization.
Insights
Mutant p53 proteins and certain isoforms can disrupt the function of normal p53, p63, and p73. This dominant-negative effect occurs through tetramer poisoning, not a prion-like mechanism.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Biology
- Genetics
Background:
- The tumor suppressor p53's activity is often lost in cancer, even with a wild-type gene present, suggesting dominant-negative effects from mutants and isoforms.
- Related proteins p63 and p73 also show loss of function, hinting at dominant-negative interactions within the p53 family.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the extent and mechanisms of dominant-negative interference among p53, p63, and p73 family members, including hotspot mutants and isoforms.
- To determine if prion-like mechanisms contribute to the loss of function.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a yeast-based system to assess the dominant-negative potential of various p53, p63, and p73 mutants and isoforms.
- Analyzed the molecular mechanisms underlying the observed dominant-negative effects.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated a widespread dominant-negative effect across the p53/p63/p73 family, with all tested p53 loss-of-function mutants and several p53 and p73 isoforms exhibiting this potential.
- Established that the dominant-negative effect on wild-type p53 primarily involves tetramer poisoning via inactive hetero-tetramer formation, refuting a prion-like mechanism.
- Showed that the p53-R175H mutant inhibits p63 and p73 through a mechanism partly dependent on tetramerization.
Conclusions:
- Dominant-negative interactions are prevalent within the p53 family, impacting tumor suppressor functions.
- Tetramer poisoning is the key mechanism for dominant-negative effects of p53 mutants and isoforms, not prion-like behavior.
- Specific mutants like p53-R175H interfere with p63 and p73 through tetramerization-dependent and independent pathways.
Related Concept Videos
Abnormal Proliferation
Negative Regulator Molecules
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle
Inhibition of Cdk Activity

