Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.5K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.5K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.7K
2.7K
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification01:14

Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification

1.3K
When drugs are administered, they can elicit either an agonist or antagonist effect on the body. Agonism occurs when a drug activates a specific receptor, triggering a biological response. On the other hand, antagonism happens when a drug binds to the same receptors but blocks their activation, thereby preventing a biological response.
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
1.3K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

15.5K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
15.5K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

10.8K
10.8K
Cross-reactivity00:42

Cross-reactivity

33.7K
Overview
33.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: Crossing sensory boundaries: multisensory perception through the lens of audition.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Pregnancy-associated melanoma: A distinct entity requiring vigilance.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2026
Same author

Differential effects of top-down crossmodal attention on subjective timing of semantic and syntactic violations.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The Illusion of Residual Disease: An Unusual Pattern of Histologic Response to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Resectable Stage III Melanoma.

International journal of dermatology·2025
Same author

Dynamic affective stimulation modulates visual but not auditory prospective timing.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Epidemiologic characteristics of de novo versus nevus-associated melanoma.

Melanoma research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

77.0K

Crossmodal binding rivalry: A "race" for integration between unequal sensory inputs.

Maria Kostaki1, Argiro Vatakis2

  • 1Postgraduate Program Basic and Applied Cognitive Science, Department of Philosophy and History of Science, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Vision Research
|September 4, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Sensory conflicts create illusions. This study found that timing and temporal configuration of audiovisual stimuli significantly impact crossmodal binding rivalry and illusory percepts, particularly for fission illusions.

Keywords:
AuditoryCrossmodal binding rivalryDouble flash illusionFission illusionFusion illusionMultisensory integrationVisual

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.1K
How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

77.0K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.1K
How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker
05:48

How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker

Published on: September 6, 2017

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Multisensory integration can lead to illusory percepts when sensory inputs conflict.
  • Crossmodal binding rivalry occurs with unequal numbers of sensory inputs.
  • Previous research suggests visual acuity influences illusion strength.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of temporal configurations and timing in crossmodal binding rivalry.
  • To examine how audiovisual stimulus timing affects sound-induced visual fission and fusion illusions.
  • To test the hypothesis that tighter audiovisual coupling leads to weaker illusions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized classic sound-induced visual fission and fusion illusions.
  • Manipulated temporal configurations and timing presentations of audiovisual stimuli.
  • Analyzed participant groups based on discrimination performance and illusion reports.

Main Results:

  • Identified two participant groups: low discrimination/strong illusion and high discrimination/weak illusion.
  • Demonstrated differential illusory strength across temporal configurations for the fission illusion.
  • Observed effects on fusion illusion strength primarily at the largest stimulus onset asynchronies.

Conclusions:

  • Findings extend previous work on visual acuity's effect on illusion strength.
  • Support the expansion of optimal integration theory to include multisensory temporal interactions.
  • Highlight the importance of temporal sequence and configuration in multisensory processing.