Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital
Published on: June 11, 2012
[Comparison of therapeutic effects between sitagliptin and voglibose both combined with sensor-augmented insulin pump
1Department of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, China.
Objective:
To compare the therapeutic effects between sitagliptin and voglibose both with sensor-augmented insulin pump (SAP) in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
Methods:
Fifty-six newly diagnosed hospitalized T2DM patients in Department of Endocrinology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value of 9%-11%, were randomized into the sitagliptin (S) group (n=28) and the voglibose (V) group (n=28) by block randomisation. Participants in S group received sitagliptin 100 mg per day, and V group received voglibose 0.2 mg for 3 times per day. All patients were treated with SAP for 9 days. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) was used. Glucose variability parameters were observed. The research has been approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University(KY2014-08).
Results:
No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). In V group and S group, fasting blood glucose (FPG) [(6.4±1.1) vs (11.4±3.0) mmol/L, P=0.008; (5.5±0.8) vs (11.0±2.1) mmol/L, P<0.001], mean blood glucose(MBG) [(7.5±0.8) vs (12.0±1.1) mmol/L, P=0.045; (6.7±0.7) vs (12.5±1.3) mmol/L, P=0.002], standard deviation of blood glucose (SDBG) (P=0.023, 0.036) decreased and homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-β (P=0.002, 0.001) increased significantly after 9 days therapy. The mean of daily differences (MODD)(P=0.027), coefficient of variation-FPG (CV-FPG) (P=0.033) and HOMA-IR (P=0.039) in S group significantly decreased, while postprandial glycemic excursion (PPGE)(P=0.003, 0.026, 0.011, 3 meals respectively)and the low glycemic index(LBGI)(P=0.025) in V group decreased, the peak postprandial level of glucose(Δt)was longer compared with before (P=0.028, 0.026, 0.030, 3 meals respectively). After therapy, PPGE in V group significantly became lower than those in S group (P=0.041, 0.032, 0.036, 3 meals respectively), while FPG and MBG in S group were significantly lower than those in V group (P=0.041, 0.039).
Conclusions:
Sitagliptin or voglibose combined with SAP can improve glucose control and protect islet function for patients with newly diagnosed T2DM. Sitagliptin has advantages in controlling MBG and FPG compared with voglibose. Voglibose has more striking advantages in reducing the postprandial blood glucose fluctuation.
Related Concept Videos
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...

