Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

3.8K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
3.8K
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation01:25

Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation

2.8K
Introduction
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
2.8K
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management01:23

Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management

510
During the postoperative period, it is crucial to focus on maintaining circulation, identifying and managing potential complications, and planning for discharge.Nursing AssessmentVital signs monitoring: Regularly monitor vital signs, including blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature, to detect early signs of complications such as bleeding and infection.Circulation assessment: Monitor pulses, perform Doppler assessments, and check capillary refill, color, temperature, and...
510
Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

2.2K
Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Parochial hospital of San Bernardo, Chile: serving the community for over a century].

Revista medica de Chile·2013
Same author

[The possible causes of the tragedy of "Port Famine" in the Strait of Magellan].

Revista medica de Chile·2011
Same author

[Resident evaluation of general surgery training programs].

Revista medica de Chile·2009
Same author

[On the death of Gabriel Cano de Aponte].

Revista medica de Chile·2008
Same author

[The possible temporal lobe syndrome of Ivan IV the Terrible].

Revista medica de Chile·2007

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
04:45

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

4.5K

[Quality assessment in surgery].

Ricardo Espinoza G1, Juan Pablo Espinoza G2

  • 1Clínica Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Chile, respinoza@clinicauandes.cl.

Revista Medica De Chile
|September 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study examines surgical quality using structure, processes, and indicators. Standardized definitions and risk factor correction enable objective comparisons of surgical outcomes and center performance.

More Related Videos

A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
07:14

A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

Published on: January 18, 2018

10.0K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
04:45

Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way

Published on: May 10, 2021

4.5K
A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
07:14

A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery

Published on: January 18, 2018

10.0K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Quality Assessment
  • Healthcare Management
  • Medical Statistics

Background:

  • Quality in surgery is intrinsically linked to effectiveness.
  • Assessing surgical quality requires objective measures like complication rates.
  • Varied definitions of surgical complications hinder comparative analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the definition and classification of surgical complications for quality assessment.
  • To discuss factors influencing surgical risk and predictive systems.
  • To highlight the importance of standardized definitions and risk adjustment for comparative analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on surgical quality, complications, and risk factors.
  • Analysis of definitions and classifications of surgical complications.
  • Discussion of risk adjustment methodologies and quality indicators.

Main Results:

  • Standardized definitions and risk-adjusted comparisons are crucial for evaluating surgical centers.
  • Key indicators include mortality, complications, length of stay, quality of life, and costs.
  • Procedure volume serves as a significant indicator of surgical quality.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized definitions and risk factor correction are essential for reliable surgical quality assessment.
  • Objective indicators allow for meaningful comparisons between surgical groups and over time.
  • Surgical procedure volume is a key metric for evaluating center and surgeon performance.