Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

Enhancing the Development and Growth of Infant Cerebral Palsy Rats Using Selective Spinal Manipulations
Published on: February 2, 2024
Neurodevelopmental outcomes in postnatal growth-restricted preterm infants with postnatal head-sparing
J M Meyers1, C M Bann2, B J Stoll3
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Insights
Postnatal head-sparing (PHS) in extremely preterm infants improved motor scores at 2 years. However, PHS did not significantly impact cognitive scores or other neurodevelopmental outcomes in this growth-restricted group.
Area of Science:
- Neonatology
- Neurodevelopmental Pediatrics
- Perinatal Medicine
Background:
- Postnatal growth restriction is common in extremely preterm infants (<29 weeks).
- Head-sparing (PHS) is a nutritional strategy aimed at preserving brain growth.
- The long-term neurodevelopmental effects of PHS in this population are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of corrected age.
- To assess the impact of PHS on growth-restricted infants born extremely preterm.
- To evaluate cognitive and motor scores, cerebral palsy, and overall neurodevelopmental impairment.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of developmental outcomes at 2 years in postnatally growth-restricted infants.
- Comparison between infants with and without PHS.
- Multivariate regression analysis adjusting for independent risk factors.
Main Results:
- Of 658 growth-restricted infants, 301 received PHS.
- Infants with PHS showed significantly higher adjusted Bayley III motor composite scores (mean difference 4.65, P<0.01).
- No significant differences were observed in cognitive scores, cerebral palsy, or overall neurodevelopmental impairment.
Conclusions:
- PHS is associated with improved motor outcomes in extremely preterm, growth-restricted infants.
- The specific benefits of PHS on neurodevelopmental outcomes appear primarily related to motor function.
- Further research is needed to understand the persistence of these effects later in life.
Objective:
To compare neurodevelopmental outcomes in postnatal growth-restricted infants born <29 weeks with and without postnatal head-sparing (PHS).
Study Design:
We analyzed developmental outcomes at 2 years of age among postnatally growth-restricted infants with and without head-sparing. The primary outcome was Bayley III cognitive composite score; secondary outcomes included Bayley III motor composite score, moderate/severe cerebral palsy, gross motor functional classification scale level⩾2, and presence or absence of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI).
Results:
Of 1098 infants evaluated at 18 to 22 months, 658 were postnatally growth restricted, of whom 301 had head-sparing. In the multivariate model including independent risk factors for poor growth and poor developmental outcome, infants with head-sparing had higher adjusted motor composite scores (mean difference 4.65, P<0.01), but no differences in other neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Conclusion:
PHS is associated with improved neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants, specifically Bayley III motor scores, but whether beneficial effects of PHS persist later in life is unknown.
Related Concept Videos
Neurulation
Nature and Nurture

