Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026

05:43
Applying Incongruent Visual-Tactile Stimuli during Object Transfer with Vibro-Tactile Feedback
Published on: May 23, 2019
5.9K
Vibrotactile perception assessment for a haptic interface on an antigravity suit
Sang Min Ko1, Kwangil Lee2, Daeho Kim3
1Department of Information and Industrial Engineering, Yonsei University, 50 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Applied Ergonomics
|September 17, 2016
Summary
Researchers developed a haptic antigravity (anti-G) suit interface using vibration motors. This study provides key data on vibration intensity and perception for designing effective haptic feedback systems for pilots.
Area of Science:
- Human-computer interaction
- Aerospace engineering
- Biomedical engineering
Background:
- Haptic technology enhances user feedback without visual or auditory cues.
- Developing an effective haptic interface for antigravity (anti-G) suits is crucial for pilot performance.
- Existing anti-G suits lack integrated haptic feedback systems.
Purpose of the Study:
- To collect preliminary data for designing a haptic interface for an anti-G suit.
- To determine optimal vibration parameters for vibrotactile stimuli in a flight simulator environment.
- To assess subjective user perception of haptic feedback for potential integration into anti-G suits.
Main Methods:
- Ten bar-type eccentric rotating mass (ERM) motors were installed in five body areas (lower back, thighs, calves).
- Three experiments were conducted with 26 fighter pilots in a fixed-based flight simulator.
- Experiments focused on determining absolute thresholds, moderate intensities, and subjective assessments of vibrotactile stimuli.
Main Results:
- Recommended absolute thresholds for vibrotactile stimuli range from approximately 11.98-15.84 Hz and 102.01-104.06 dB.
- Moderate intensity recommendations include 74.36 Hz and 126.98 dB for the lower back, and 58.65 Hz and 122.37 dB for thighs and calves.
- Subjective assessments revealed data on displeasure, ease of perception, and comfort levels associated with the vibrotactile stimuli.
Conclusions:
- The determined vibrotactile parameters provide essential data for the development of a haptic anti-G suit.
- Findings will guide the design of effective haptic feedback systems, improving pilot situational awareness and performance.
- This research lays the groundwork for integrating advanced haptic technology into aerospace applications.
Related Concept Videos
Responses to Gravity and Touch
42.2K
Gravitropism: Plant Responses to Gravity
42.2K
Tactile and Chemical Senses
1.2K
Tactile senses encompass touch, temperature, and pain, each mediated by specific receptors. Touch receptors detect mechanical energy or pressure against the skin. Sensory fibers from these receptors enter the spinal cord and relay information to the brain stem. Here, most fibers cross over to the opposite side of the brain. The touch information then moves to the thalamus, which projects a map of the body's surface onto the somatosensory areas of the parietal lobes in the cerebral cortex.
1.2K
Design Example: Resistive Touchscreen
857
A device engineer plays a crucial role in designing user interfaces for mobile devices. One such interface is the resistive touchscreen, which fundamentally consists of two metallic layers: a flexible upper layer and a rigid lower layer, separated by a narrow gap. The high resistance between these two layers is a key characteristic of this design.
When a user touches the screen, the two layers make contact at a specific point known as the touchpoint. This contact reduces the resistance between...
When a user touches the screen, the two layers make contact at a specific point known as the touchpoint. This contact reduces the resistance between...
857
Frictional Forces on Flat Belts
1.6K
Flat belts are commonly used in various industrial applications for transmitting power from one pulley to another. When a flat belt is wrapped around a set of pulleys, it experiences different tensions at the driving pulley ends due to the friction between the belt and pulley surface. When the pulley moves in a counterclockwise direction, the tension T2 on the opposite side of the pulley where the belt is moving away from is higher than the tension T1 on the side where the belt is moving...
1.6K

