Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

358
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
358
Bias01:22

Bias

7.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

283
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
283
Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

292
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
292
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

460
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
460

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ConversationAlign: Open-source software for analyzing patterns of lexical use and alignment in conversation transcripts.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: NaturalTurn: a method to segment speech into psychologically meaningful conversational turns.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

NaturalTurn: a method to segment speech into psychologically meaningful conversational turns.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Spread of Injectate After Combined Deep Serratus Anterior and Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Injections: A Cadaver Study to Evaluate Their Utility in Breast Surgery.

Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2025
Same author

Abstract word dropout and cross-speaker misalignment of word concreteness are features of conversation in aging.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025
Same author

An illusion of unfairness in random coin flips.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2025
Same journal

Chemotactic self-organization captures the dynamics of mammalian hair follicle patterning.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Tomographic imaging of superconducting order using particle-hole interference.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory potential of autologous neutralizing antibodies sets quantitative limits on the rebound-competent HIV-1 reservoir.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Inferring epidemiological parameters under an infectious phylogeography model with visitor dynamics.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Analytical modeling for suction cup designs for skin-interfaced wearable devices.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Improving cell-free metabolism through direct integration of artificial respiratory chains.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 15, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K

When fairness matters less than we expect.

Gus Cooney1, Daniel T Gilbert2, Timothy D Wilson3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; guscooney@gmail.com.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|September 18, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Resource allocators overestimate fairness impact on recipients

Keywords:
affective forecastingdecision-makingfairness

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

25.0K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 15, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.2K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

25.0K
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Decision-making
  • Behavioral economics
  • Social psychology

Background:

  • Resource allocation decisions significantly impact recipient welfare.
  • Understanding the psychological factors influencing allocation is crucial for equitable outcomes.
  • Perceptions of fairness play a key role in recipient satisfaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate allocators' predictions of fairness's impact on recipients' happiness.
  • To compare allocators' predictions with recipients' actual happiness levels.
  • To identify the cognitive biases affecting resource allocation decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Seven experimental studies were conducted.
  • Participants acted as allocators, deciding resource distribution between two recipients.
  • Allocation procedures varied between fair and unfair conditions.
  • Recipient happiness was measured post-allocation.

Main Results:

  • Allocators consistently overestimated the importance of procedural fairness on recipient happiness.
  • This overestimation stemmed from allocators' pre-allocation perspective, where fairness is more salient.
  • Recipients reported greater happiness receiving more money via an unfair procedure than less money via a fair one.

Conclusions:

  • Allocators struggle to adopt recipients' post-allocation perspectives.
  • This perspective-taking failure leads to suboptimal resource allocation that does not maximize overall happiness.
  • Improving allocators' empathy and perspective-taking can enhance resource distribution outcomes.