Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Soft-tissue masses: diagnosis using MR imaging.

M J Kransdorf1, J S Jelinek, R P Moser

  • 1Department of Radiology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307-5001.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|September 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imaging of spindle cell lipoma.

Clinical radiology·2020
Same author

Finding the striatum in sheep: use of a multi-modal guided approach for convection enhanced delivery.

Journal of Huntington's disease·2014
Same author

Subtrochanteric insufficiency fractures associated with bisphosphonate use: 2 case reports and review.

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation·2013
Same author

Smokers' unrealistic optimism about their risk.

Tobacco control·2005
Same author

From the archives of AFIP. Imaging of giant cell tumor and giant cell reparative granuloma of bone: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2001
Same author

Begnign bone tumors of childhood.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2001
Same journal

The Need for a Practical Reporting Framework for Pelvic Venous Findings on Imaging.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

A Practical Guide to PSMA PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Prostate Cancer Imaging, From the AJR Special Series on Molecular Imaging.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging can specifically diagnose some soft-tissue masses. However, MR imaging cannot reliably differentiate between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Soft-tissue masses require accurate diagnosis for appropriate treatment.
  • Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging is a key modality for soft-tissue mass evaluation.
  • Distinguishing benign from malignant lesions preoperatively is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the diagnostic specificity of MR imaging for soft-tissue masses.
  • To evaluate the capability of MR imaging in differentiating benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors.
  • To analyze MR image characteristics predictive of lesion type and behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 112 soft-tissue masses using T1- and T2-weighted MR sequences.
  • Pathologic diagnosis by biopsy in 96 cases; diagnosis by imaging and clinical follow-up in 16 cases.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of lesion margins, surrounding tissue impact (edema, infiltration), and signal intensity/homogeneity.

    • Main Results:

    • Specific preoperative diagnosis based solely on MR appearance was achieved in 27% (27/112) of cases.
    • Diagnosed entities included lipomas, hemangiomas, pigmented villonodular synovitis, hematomas, and arteriovenous malformations.
    • MR imaging was unable to reliably distinguish between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors.

    Conclusions:

    • MR imaging can provide specific diagnoses for a subset of soft-tissue masses.
    • The current MR imaging approach is insufficient for reliably differentiating benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors.
    • Further research into advanced MR techniques may improve the characterization of soft-tissue lesions.