Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: An Efficient and Robust Software for Automated Fusion of Multiple Preclinical Imaging Modalities
Published on: October 27, 2023
Using collision cones to assess biological deconfliction methods
Natalie L Brace1, Tyson L Hedrick2, Diane H Theriault3
1William E. Boeing Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA nbrace@uw.edu.
Abstract:
Biological systems consistently outperform autonomous systems governed by engineered algorithms in their ability to reactively avoid collisions. To better understand this discrepancy, a collision avoidance algorithm was applied to frames of digitized video trajectory data from bats, swallows and fish (Myotis velifer, Petrochelidon pyrrhonota and Danio aequipinnatus). Information available from visual cues, specifically relative position and velocity, was provided to the algorithm which used this information to define collision cones that allowed the algorithm to find a safe velocity requiring minimal deviation from the original velocity. The subset of obstacles provided to the algorithm was determined by the animal's sensing range in terms of metric and topological distance. The algorithmic calculated velocities showed good agreement with observed biological velocities, indicating that the algorithm was an informative basis for comparison with the three species and could potentially be improved for engineered applications with further study.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Elastic Collisions: Case Study
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
Types of Collisions - II
Elastic Collisions: Introduction
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Introduction
Types Of Collisions - I

