Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
A Group Decision Framework with Intuitionistic Preference Relations and Its Application to Low Carbon Supplier
1School of Management, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China. txiayu@zufe.edu.cn.
This study introduces a new framework for group decision-making using intuitionistic preference relations. It enhances decision quality by weighting inputs based on their consistency, improving group consensus.
Area of Science:
- Decision Sciences
- Fuzzy Logic
- Operations Research
Background:
- Group decision-making often faces challenges with inconsistent individual preferences.
- Intuitionistic preference relations offer a robust way to represent uncertainty and vagueness in judgments.
- Existing aggregation methods may not adequately account for the consistency of individual inputs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a group decision framework that handles intuitionistic preference relations.
- To propose a method for rectifying inconsistent intuitionistic preference relations.
- To introduce a novel aggregation operator that weights decisions based on input consistency.
Main Methods:
- Developing an approach to transform inconsistent intuitionistic preference relations into consistent ones.
- Proposing the induced intuitionistic ordered weighted averaging (IIOWA) operator for aggregating judgments.
- Utilizing mean absolute deviation to determine the order-inducing variable for weighting decision-makers.
Main Results:
- A method to derive additive consistent intuitionistic preference relations from inconsistent ones.
- The IIOWA operator effectively aggregates individual intuitionistic fuzzy judgments.
- A group decision framework that assigns weights based on the consistency of decision-makers' initial judgments.
Conclusions:
- The proposed framework provides a systematic approach to group decision-making with intuitionistic preference relations.
- The IIOWA operator and consistency-based weighting enhance the reliability of collective decisions.
- The framework is applicable to practical problems, such as low-carbon supplier selection.
More Related Videos
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
07:05Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Reason and Intuition
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
The Representativeness Heuristic
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility