Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Feasibility and Safety of Evaluating Patients with Prior Coronary Artery Disease Using an Accelerated Diagnostic
Roy Beigel1, Alexander Fardman1, Ronen Goldkorn1
1The Leviev Heart Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, affiliated to The Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Insights
Patients with prior coronary artery disease (CAD) can safely use accelerated diagnostic protocols in a chest pain unit (CPU). This approach yields similar outcomes to those without a history of CAD, ensuring efficient evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Diagnostic Protocols
Background:
- Accelerated diagnostic protocols are standard for low-risk acute chest pain.
- Limited data exist on their use in patients with prior coronary artery disease (CAD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the feasibility and safety of accelerated diagnostic protocols for patients with a history of prior CAD.
- To compare outcomes in patients with and without prior CAD using these protocols.
Main Methods:
- Evaluated 1,220 consecutive acute chest pain patients in a chest pain unit (CPU).
- Stratified patients based on history of prior CAD.
- Assessed a composite primary outcome of readmission, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, or death at 60 days.
Main Results:
- 268 patients (22%) had a history of prior CAD.
- Hospitalization rates, coronary angiography, and revascularization rates were similar between groups.
- The 60-day primary endpoint occurred in 1.6% of patients without prior CAD and 3.2% of patients with prior CAD (p=0.836).
Conclusions:
- Accelerated diagnostic protocols are feasible and safe for evaluating patients with prior CAD in a CPU.
- Outcomes for patients with prior CAD using these protocols do not differ significantly from those without prior CAD.
Abstract:
An accelerated diagnostic protocol for evaluating low-risk patients with acute chest pain in a cardiologist-based chest pain unit (CPU) is widely employed today. However, limited data exist regarding the feasibility of such an algorithm for patients with a history of prior coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of the current study was to assess the feasibility and safety of evaluating patients with a history of prior CAD using an accelerated diagnostic protocol. We evaluated 1,220 consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain and hospitalized in our CPU. Patients were stratified according to whether they had a history of prior CAD or not. The primary composite outcome was defined as a composite of readmission due to chest pain, acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization, or death during a 60-day follow-up period. Overall, 268 (22%) patients had a history of prior CAD. Non-invasive evaluation was performed in 1,112 (91%) patients. While patients with a history of prior CAD had more comorbidities, the two study groups were similar regarding hospitalization rates (9% vs. 13%, p = 0.08), coronary angiography (13% vs. 11%, p = 0.41), and revascularization (6.5% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.8) performed during CPU evaluation. At 60-days the primary endpoint was observed in 12 (1.6%) and 6 (3.2%) patients without and with a history of prior CAD, respectively (p = 0.836). No mortalities were recorded. To conclude, Patients with a history of prior CAD can be expeditiously and safely evaluated using an accelerated diagnostic protocol in a CPU with outcomes not differing from patients without such a history.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

