Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

560
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
560
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

519
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
519
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II01:18

Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II

2.2K
The person's health status fluctuates continually, varying from being in good health to becoming ill and returning to being healthy. To understand the concept of illness prevention, there are two models. First, the health-illness continuum model is a graphic representation of an individual's wellness. It states that a person is considered healthy in the absence of physical disease and the presence of good emotional health.
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
2.2K
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

12.9K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.9K
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention01:26

Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention

15.4K
Health promotion allows a person to control the determinants of health, resulting in an improved health status. It enhances the quality of life and reduces premature deaths. Health promotion and illness prevention programs help people make beneficial choices to reduce the risk of disease and disabilities. There are three health promotion and illness prevention levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention.
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
15.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On quantitizing revisited.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Childhood sexual abuse and antiretroviral therapy adherence among older adults living with HIV: a mixed methods study.

AIDS care·2023
Same author

Changes in perceptions of teaching quality in secondary schools in Rwanda during the COVID-19 global pandemic and the subsequent closing and reopening of schools.

Social sciences & humanities open·2023
Same author

Emotion differentiation and negative emotional states: the mediating role of perceived academic control and the moderated effect of intrinsic motivation.

Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)·2022
Same author

Care Transition From the Perspectives of Oncological Patients and the Multiprofessional Care Team: A Mixed Methods Study.

Cancer nursing·2022
Same author

The Specificity of Observational Studies in Physical Activity and Sports Sciences: Moving Forward in Mixed Methods Research and Proposals for Achieving Quantitative and Qualitative Symmetry.

Frontiers in psychology·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
05:52

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis

Published on: November 21, 2013

15.6K

Effects of a Comprehensive, Multiple Risky Behavior Prevention Program on High School Students.

Crystal Collier1, Anthony J Onwuegbuzie2, Alicia LaChapelle3

  • 1Department of Educational Leadership and Counseling, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA; The Council on Recovery, Houston, TX, USA.

Journal of Addiction
|September 28, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A school-wide risky behaviors prevention program significantly reduced alcohol and drug use among students. However, non-substance-related risky behaviors require more intensive prevention efforts for greater impact.

More Related Videos

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
06:15

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents

Published on: July 10, 2017

13.9K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
05:52

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis

Published on: November 21, 2013

15.6K
A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
06:15

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents

Published on: July 10, 2017

13.9K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Adolescent Health
  • School-Based Prevention Programs
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Youth face diverse and increasing risky behaviors.
  • Comprehensive prevention programs are essential for addressing these challenges.
  • Effective programs integrate multiple intervention levels.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a comprehensive, multi-level risky behaviors prevention program in a school system.
  • To assess the program's impact on various substance-use and non-substance-use risky behaviors over four years.

Main Methods:

  • A 4-year longitudinal study was conducted in a private high school.
  • The program targeted universal, selective, and indicated student levels.
  • Data were collected from 469 to 614 participants.

Main Results:

  • Seven out of 15 risky behaviors showed statistically significant decreases.
  • Six of the decreased behaviors were related to alcohol and drug use.
  • Non-substance-use risky behaviors exhibited inconsistent patterns and lacked significant change.

Conclusions:

  • The prevention program effectively reduced substance-related risky behaviors.
  • Increased frequency and intensity of programming are needed for non-substance-use behaviors.
  • Findings inform school policies, prevention specialists, and future research.