Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model
Published on: August 17, 2022
Effect of a New Risk Calculator on Patient Satisfaction With the Decision for Concomitant Midurethral Sling During
Jeannine Marie Miranne1, Robert Eric Gutman, Andrew Ian Sokol
1From the *Division of Urogynecology Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School Boston, MA; and †Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery MedStar Washington Hospital Center/Georgetown University School of Medicine Washington, DC.
A new risk calculator for de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery did not improve patient satisfaction with prophylactic midurethral sling (MUS) decisions. Patient satisfaction remained similar between groups receiving standard counseling versus counseling with the risk calculator.
Area of Science:
- Urogynecology
- Pelvic Floor Disorders
- Surgical Decision-Making
Background:
- Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery often involves decisions about prophylactic midurethral sling (MUS) placement to prevent stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
- Patient satisfaction with these surgical decisions is crucial for optimal outcomes.
- Personalized risk calculators aim to enhance informed decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if a personalized risk calculator for de novo SUI increases patient satisfaction with the decision to undergo prophylactic MUS placement during POP surgery.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial was conducted with women undergoing POP surgery.
- Participants were randomized to standard preoperative counseling or counseling using an online risk calculator for de novo SUI.
- Patient satisfaction with the MUS decision was assessed at 3 months postoperatively using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale for Pelvic Floor Disorders.
Main Results:
- 33 women completed the study, with 17 in the risk calculator group and 16 in the standard counseling group.
- No significant difference in patient satisfaction scores was observed between the risk calculator group (4.67 ± 0.46) and the standard counseling group (4.78 ± 0.34) at 3 months postoperative (P = 0.61).
Conclusions:
- The use of a de novo SUI risk calculator did not enhance patient satisfaction with the decision regarding prophylactic MUS placement during POP surgery.
- Further research may be needed to identify effective tools for improving patient satisfaction in this surgical context.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Urinary Tract Calculi III: Medical Management

