Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

18.9K
All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...
18.9K
Gauss's Law: Spherical Symmetry01:26

Gauss's Law: Spherical Symmetry

9.7K
A charge distribution has spherical symmetry if the density of charge depends only on the distance from a point in space and not on the direction. In other words, if the system is rotated, it doesn't look different. For instance, if a sphere of radius R is uniformly charged with charge density ρ0, then the distribution has spherical symmetry. On the other hand, if a sphere of radius R is charged so that the top half of the sphere has a uniform charge density ρ1 and the bottom half has a...
9.7K
Gauss's Law: Planar Symmetry01:27

Gauss's Law: Planar Symmetry

9.9K
A planar symmetry of charge density is obtained when charges are uniformly spread over a large flat surface. In planar symmetry, all points in a plane parallel to the plane of charge are identical with respect to the charges. Suppose the plane of the charge distribution is the xy-plane, and the electric field at a space point P with coordinates (x, y, z) is to be determined. Since the charge density is the same at all (x, y) - coordinates in the z = 0 plane, by symmetry, the electric field at P...
9.9K
Gauss's Law: Problem-Solving01:10

Gauss's Law: Problem-Solving

2.8K
Gauss's law helps determine electric fields even though the law is not directly about electric fields but electric flux. In situations with certain symmetries (spherical, cylindrical, or planar) in the charge distribution, the electric field can be deduced based on the knowledge of the electric flux. In these systems, we can find a Gaussian surface S over which the electric field has a constant magnitude. Furthermore, suppose the electric field is parallel (or antiparallel) to the area vector...
2.8K
Gauss's Law01:07

Gauss's Law

10.1K
If a closed surface does not have any charge inside where an electric field line can terminate, then the electric field line entering the surface at one point must necessarily exit at some other point of the surface. Therefore, if a closed surface does not have any charges inside the enclosed volume, then the electric flux through the surface is zero. What happens to the electric flux if there are some charges inside the enclosed volume? Gauss's law gives a quantitative answer to this question.
10.1K
Electric Field of a Non Uniformly Charged Sphere01:22

Electric Field of a Non Uniformly Charged Sphere

2.4K
Gauss's law states that the electric flux through any closed surface equals the net charge enclosed within the surface. This law is beneficial for determining the expressions for the electric field for a particular charge distribution if the electric flux is known.
Consider a non-uniformly charged sphere, for which the density of charge depends only on the distance from a point in space and not on the direction. Such a sphere has a spherically symmetrical charge distribution. Here, the electric...
2.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Berger-linear Buildup Approximation for Air.

Health physics·2021
Same author

Metal Emissions from Joule-Heated Vitrification Systems.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2017
Same author

Performance of a Suspended-Growth Bioscrubber for the Control of Methanol.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2017
Same author

Optical characteristics of southeast Asia's regional aerosols and their sources.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2011
Same author

Stable plume rise in a shear layer.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2007
Same author

Solutions to the Gaussian cloud approximation for gamma absorbed dose.

Health physics·2006

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera
06:28

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera

Published on: January 30, 2020

13.3K

An Exact Solution for the Ground-level Gamma Dose Rate from a Spherical Gaussian Puff.

Thomas J Overcamp1

  • 1*Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences, 445 Brackett Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0919.

Health Physics
|September 30, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Analytical solutions for absorbed dose rate integrals were developed for Gaussian puffs. These methods simplify calculations for radiation dose assessment, aiding in environmental radiation safety evaluations.

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.8K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

3.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera
06:28

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera

Published on: January 30, 2020

13.3K
Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.8K
Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
07:57

Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform

Published on: March 24, 2022

3.3K

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Physics
  • Dosimetry
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of radiation dose rates from airborne radioactive material is crucial for environmental safety.
  • Gaussian puff models are commonly used to simulate the dispersion of airborne contaminants.
  • Buildup approximations are necessary to account for photon scattering and secondary radiation in dose calculations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop analytical solutions for the absorbed dose rate integral of a spherically symmetric Gaussian puff.
  • To provide mathematically simpler solutions for dose rate calculations at the puff center.
  • To enable graphical estimation of dose rate ratios and compare different buildup approximations.

Main Methods:

  • Development of analytical solutions utilizing linear and Berger buildup approximations.
  • Formulation of simplified mathematical expressions for dose rate at the puff center.
  • Graphical analysis for comparing dose rates from puff models to infinite cloud models.
  • Comparative calculations of dose rate integrals using linear versus Berger buildup approximations.

Main Results:

  • Established analytical solutions for absorbed dose rate integrals for Gaussian puffs under different buildup approximations.
  • Derived simplified solutions for dose rate at the puff center, applicable to various puff and receptor heights.
  • Quantified dose rate ratios between puff and infinite cloud models.
  • Determined the impact of the Berger buildup parameter on dose rate calculations compared to linear buildup.

Conclusions:

  • The developed analytical solutions offer a more efficient and accurate method for calculating absorbed dose rates from Gaussian puffs.
  • The simplified solutions and graphical tools facilitate practical dose assessment in environmental radiation monitoring.
  • Understanding the differences between linear and Berger buildup approximations is important for precise radiation dose estimations, especially with varying environmental conditions.