Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Optimizing Trial Designs for Targeted Therapies
Thomas Ondra1, Sebastian Jobjörnsson2, Robert A Beckman3,4
1Section for Medical Statistics, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract:
An important objective in the development of targeted therapies is to identify the populations where the treatment under consideration has positive benefit risk balance. We consider pivotal clinical trials, where the efficacy of a treatment is tested in an overall population and/or in a pre-specified subpopulation. Based on a decision theoretic framework we derive optimized trial designs by maximizing utility functions. Features to be optimized include the sample size and the population in which the trial is performed (the full population or the targeted subgroup only) as well as the underlying multiple test procedure. The approach accounts for prior knowledge of the efficacy of the drug in the considered populations using a two dimensional prior distribution. The considered utility functions account for the costs of the clinical trial as well as the expected benefit when demonstrating efficacy in the different subpopulations. We model utility functions from a sponsor's as well as from a public health perspective, reflecting actual civil interests. Examples of optimized trial designs obtained by numerical optimization are presented for both perspectives.
Insights
This study optimizes clinical trial designs for targeted therapies by maximizing utility functions. It helps identify patient populations with a favorable benefit-risk balance for new treatments.
Area of Science:
- Clinical trial design
- Decision theory
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Developing targeted therapies requires identifying patient populations with a positive benefit-risk balance.
- Pivotal clinical trials assess treatment efficacy in overall or pre-specified subpopulations.
- Optimizing trial design is crucial for efficient drug development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To derive optimized clinical trial designs using a decision theoretic framework.
- To maximize utility functions considering sample size, trial population, and statistical procedures.
- To incorporate prior knowledge of drug efficacy and model diverse utility perspectives.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a decision theoretic framework to maximize utility functions.
- Incorporated a two-dimensional prior distribution for prior efficacy knowledge.
- Modeled utility functions from both sponsor and public health perspectives.
- Employed numerical optimization to determine optimal trial designs.
Main Results:
- Developed a method for optimizing pivotal clinical trial designs.
- Demonstrated the ability to optimize sample size, population selection, and multiple testing procedures.
- Showcased optimized designs considering cost, expected benefit, and prior efficacy data.
- Presented examples of optimized designs from sponsor and public health viewpoints.
Conclusions:
- The decision theoretic framework provides an optimized approach to clinical trial design for targeted therapies.
- This method allows for the selection of appropriate patient populations and trial parameters to ensure a positive benefit-risk balance.
- Accounting for prior knowledge and diverse utility functions enhances the efficiency and relevance of trial designs.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
Clinical Trials: Overview
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine

