Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

216
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
216
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

31.1K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
31.1K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.1K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.5K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the foundations of forensic identification evidence: A critical examination of proficiency test design and results.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Youth Sex Trafficking Survivors' Perspectives on Communication With Health Practitioners.

Journal of forensic nursing·2026
Same author

Lay perceptions of child witnesses: effects of presentation of rapport building in forensic interviews.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2026
Same author

A Framework for Estimating the Value of Deterrence.

International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA 2019) Charleston, SC, April 28-May 3, 2019. International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (2019 : Charleston, S.C.)·2025
Same author

Training Humans to Detect Children's Lies Through Their Facial Expressions.

Applied cognitive psychology·2025
Same author

Ineffectiveness of the "consistent with" judicial limitation on forensic firearm identification testimony.

Law and human behavior·2025
Same journal

Viewing police body-worn camera video of use-of-force incidents: Does repeated or slow-motion viewing matter?

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

Psychopathy in the context of adversity: Understanding associations of early-life adversity and psychopathic symptoms in a sample of justice-involved youth.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

Race and ethnicity in the courtroom workgroup: Can diversifying the court solve racial and ethnic disparities in case outcomes?

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

The justice motive: Retributive and restorative factors affect public evaluations of child protection.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

A risk-need-responsivity (RNR)-informed systematic review of needs during the pretrial period.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

When we do not care about what happens to "criminals": How character judgments influence indifference to incidental suffering in the criminal justice system.

Law and human behavior·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

Detecting deception in children: A meta-analysis.

Jennifer Gongola1, Nicholas Scurich1, Jodi A Quas1

  • 1Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine.

Law and Human Behavior
|September 30, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Adults can detect children's lies only slightly better than chance, accurately identifying truths more often than falsehoods. Child's age did not impact detection accuracy in this meta-analysis.

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.9K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

8.9K
Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.9K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology
  • Child Psychology

Background:

  • Children as young as 3 exhibit deceptive behaviors.
  • Adults frequently evaluate children's truthfulness in various settings, including legal contexts.
  • Existing research on adults' ability to detect children's deception is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To synthesize research on adults' accuracy in detecting deceptive statements made by children.
  • To determine the overall effectiveness of adults in distinguishing truth from lies in children's accounts.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a meta-analysis of 45 experiments.
  • Included data from 7,893 adult judges and 1,858 children.
  • Analyzed adults' accuracy in classifying children's statements as truthful or deceptive.

Main Results:

  • Adults discriminated truths/lies at 54% accuracy, slightly above chance.
  • True statements were correctly identified as honest 63.8% of the time.
  • Lies were identified as dishonest only 47.5% of the time, not significantly above chance.
  • Professionals showed slightly better accuracy than laypersons.
  • Child's age did not significantly influence detection accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Adults' ability to detect children's deception is limited, particularly for lies.
  • Future research should explore individual differences in children's deception for potential indicators.
  • Improving lie detection accuracy in children requires further investigation into reliable deception cues.