Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in Juvenile Landrace Swine: A LVAD Implantation Model of Pediatric Heart Failure
Published on: January 16, 2026
Cardiac Recovery During Long-Term Left Ventricular Assist Device Support
Omar Wever-Pinzon1, Stavros G Drakos1, Stephen H McKellar2
1Utah Cardiac Recovery Program, Salt Lake City, Utah; Division of Cardiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Cardiac recovery after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is rare but more common with a bridge-to-recovery strategy. A new tool, I-CARS, helps predict recovery feasibility in LVAD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) research programs focusing on cardiac recovery are scarce, making recovery a rare event in multi-center registries.
- Identifying patients suitable for cardiac recovery post-LVAD implantation remains a significant clinical challenge.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the incidence of cardiac recovery in patients undergoing LVAD implantation with a specific bridge-to-recovery (BTR) strategy.
- To develop and validate a predictive model for cardiac recovery in LVAD recipients.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of LVAD recipients from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS).
- Comparison of cardiac recovery rates between BTR and non-BTR patients.
- Development and external validation of a weighted recovery predictive score (I-CARS) using the Utah Cardiac Recovery (UCAR) program cohort.
Main Results:
- Cardiac recovery occurred in 1.3% of 15,138 INTERMACS patients, with a significantly higher incidence (11.2%) in the BTR group compared to the non-BTR group (1.2%).
- Key independent predictors of recovery included younger age, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, shorter time since diagnosis, absence of ICD, normal creatinine, and smaller LVEDD.
- The I-CARS score demonstrated high predictive accuracy (c-index: 0.85) and was well-validated in the UCAR cohort (AUC: 0.94).
Conclusions:
- The incidence of cardiac recovery is substantially higher when an a priori bridge-to-recovery strategy is employed.
- The developed I-CARS tool effectively stratifies patients based on their likelihood of achieving cardiac recovery after LVAD implantation.
- Further large-scale studies are necessary to comprehensively evaluate post-explantation outcomes in patients who achieve cardiac recovery.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

