Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Local Versus General Anesthesia in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Avais Jabbar1, Ayush Khurana1, Ashfaq Mohammed1
1Cardiothoracic Services, Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) under local anesthesia (LA) is as safe as general anesthesia (GA). This approach reduces procedure time and hospital stay, offering a cost-effective alternative for TAVR patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Anesthesiology
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is typically performed under general anesthesia (GA).
- Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram imaging is standard with GA.
- Alternative anesthesia methods are being explored to improve patient outcomes and resource utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAVR performed under local anesthesia (LA).
- To compare the length of hospital stay for TAVR patients managed under LA versus GA.
- To assess the feasibility of transferring LA TAVR patients to a low-dependency unit post-procedure.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of transfemoral TAVR procedures conducted between January 2011.
- Comparison of patient outcomes between a group undergoing TAVR under GA (n=145) and a group under LA (n=71).
- Assessment of procedural time, 30-day adverse events (aortic regurgitation, permanent pacing, cerebrovascular accidents), 30-day survival, and hospital length of stay.
Main Results:
- The LA group had a significantly shorter procedure time (108 vs. 143 minutes, p < 0.001).
- No significant differences were observed in 30-day rates of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation, need for permanent pacing, or disabling cerebrovascular accidents between groups.
- The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LA group (2 days vs. 4 days, p < 0.001). 30-day survival was high in both groups (100% LA vs. 95.9% GA).
Conclusions:
- Performing TAVR under LA is a safe alternative to GA.
- LA TAVR is associated with reduced procedural time and shorter hospital stays.
- LA TAVR is a safe, cost-effective option, enabling transfer to low-dependency units post-procedure.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics

