Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Prediction of 3-year clinical course in CADASIL
Eric Jouvent1, Edouard Duchesnay1, Foued Hadj-Selem1
1From UMR-S 1161 INSERM (E.J., F.D.G., D.H., H.C.), Sorbonne Paris Cité, University Paris Diderot; Department of Neurology (E.J., F.D.G., D.H., H.C.), AP-HP, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris; DHU NeuroVasc Sorbonne Paris Cité (E.J., F.D.G., D.H., H.C.); LNAO (E.D., F.H.-S., J.-F.M.), Neurospin, I2BM, CEA, Saclay, France; Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München (M. Duering, M. Dichgans), Munich; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) (M. Dichgans), Munich; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) (M. Dichgans), Munich, Germany; and Department of Neurology (S.R., R.S.), Medical University of Graz, Austria.
Objective:
To obtain simple models predicting disease evolution at 3 years for a given patient with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL).
Methods:
Based on data obtained in a prospective study of 236 patients, we built and validated models predicting, at the individual level, 3-year changes in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS), Trail Making Test version B (TMTB), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS). These models were based on different sets of predictors obtained at baseline, including either clinical data (epidemiologic data and cardiovascular risk factors) or clinical data and quantitative MRI markers (volume of lacunes [LLV], volume of white matter hyperintensities, normalized brain volume [BPF], number of microbleeds). The Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and the coefficient of determination (R2) were used to determine models with the highest predictive ability and the lowest numbers of predictors.
Results:
We obtained validated models with a demonstrated ability to predict, for a given patient, 3-year changes in MMSE, MDRS, TMTB, and mRS (R2 on independent samples: 0.22, 0.12, 0.09, and 0.17, respectively). In all cases, the best models according to R2 and BIC values included only the baseline values of the outcome, of BPF, and of LLV. Inclusion of other potential predictors always led to a loss of generalizability.
Conclusions:
The prediction of 3-year changes in MMSE, MDRS, TMTB, and mRS for a given patient with CADASIL can be obtained using simple models relying only on the initial values of the considered score, BPF, and LLV.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
10:46A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy