Institutionally shared trauma rotations are viable solutions to deficiencies in trauma training

Numerous national trauma leaders have expressed concern about the lack of uniformity of trauma training in this country. In 1984 we instituted a trauma rotation between the University of Louisville (U.L.), with a large trauma volume, and Loyola University (L.U.) in the planning stages of trauma center development. Third year L.U. residents rotated at U.L. in 3-month blocks with an increased level of responsibility monthly, culminating in major decision-making roles and operative treatment under the chief resident's direction. The L.U. residents functioned as full members of the team and not as passive observers. Fifteen L.U. residents and 12 U.L. residents rotated during this period. Yearly major trauma visits, helicopter flights, and trauma service admissions average 1,908, 700, and 1,520, respectively. U.L. chief residents averaged 136 major operative trauma cases and 115 nonoperative trauma cases each were managed during this time period (RRC records greater than 85th percentile for all U.L. residents). L.U. residents performed an average of 30 major operative cases, nine as teaching assistant, in 3 months. Each managed more than 75 nonoperative cases. Several elements are critical in such a multi-institutional rotation: 1) active communication among the program directors, 2) commitment to one sharing arrangement only, 3) financing and malpractice for off-site residents, 4) housing, and 5) the ability to assimilate off-site residents as true trauma team members. The resident-to-resident interplay is crucial and has succeeded because both residency staffs have had excellent early training.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)