Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026
10:42
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
7.1K
Midfacial Reconstruction - A Systematic Review
Aala Emara1, Adel Abou ElFetouh1, Maha Hakam1
1Oral Maxillofacial Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences
|October 6, 2016
Summary
Midfacial reconstruction after maxillectomy often uses fibular and radial grafts. Evaluating these techniques is challenging due to limited high-quality evidence and subjective outcome measures.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Background:
- Surgical reconstruction is essential for midfacial defects following maxillectomy.
- A comprehensive review of reconstructive techniques is needed to assess esthetic and functional outcomes.
Observation:
- A systematic search identified 14 studies for inclusion.
- Fibular and radial vascularized grafts are frequently reported reconstructive methods.
- Computer-aided design and surgical planning represent an emerging approach.
Findings:
- The review identified fibular and radial vascularized grafts as common reconstruction methods.
- Evidence quality is limited by a lack of randomized controlled trials and large case series.
- Subjective and qualitative evaluation methods complicate the assessment of reconstructive techniques.
Implications:
- Further research with robust methodologies is required to establish evidence-based guidelines for midfacial reconstruction.
- Standardized outcome measures are needed for objective evaluation of reconstructive techniques.
- Advancements in computer-aided design offer potential for improved surgical planning and outcomes.
