Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An Alternative Strategy for Selecting a Graduate Program: Comments on Dixon et al. (2015).

Philip N Hineline1

  • 1grid.264727.20000000122483398Temple University, 3020 Midvale Avenue, 19129 Philadelphia, PA USA.

Behavior Analysis in Practice
|October 6, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Teaching Behavior Analysis through Its History: Narrative and Stories.

Perspectives on behavior scienceยท2023
See all related articles

Prospective graduate students should consider personal interests and mentor fit over publication frequency. Evaluating hands-on training and program support is crucial for effective behavior analyst training.

Area of Science:

  • Behavior Analysis
  • Psychology
  • Education

Background:

  • Traditional program rankings may not fully capture the quality of graduate training in behavior analysis.
  • Factors beyond publication frequency are essential for student success and effective mentorship.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose alternative criteria for evaluating graduate programs in behavior analysis.
  • To guide students in selecting programs that align with their interests and mentorship needs.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of factors beyond publication metrics.
  • Emphasis on student-reported experiences and hands-on training.
  • Consideration of program environment and mentorship availability.

Main Results:

Keywords:
Graduate program selectionHands-on trainingMentoringVerbal community

Related Experiment Videos

  • Student-specific interests and mentor compatibility are key selection factors.
  • Hands-on training and a supportive learning community enhance program quality.
  • Existing credentials and accreditation may not encompass all effective training models.

Conclusions:

  • A holistic approach to program evaluation, prioritizing student needs and practical training, is recommended.
  • Mentorship quality and program environment are critical for developing competent behavior analysts.
  • Alternative training pathways, including apprenticeships, should be recognized.