Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
Published on: December 16, 2013
Complexes of Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) with small peptides: deciding whether to deprotonate
Robert C Dunbar1, Jonathan Martens2, Giel Berden2
1Chemistry Department, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA. rcd@po.cwru.edu.
Abstract:
The observed variety of metal-ion complexation sites offered by peptides reflects a basic tension between charge solvation of the ion by Lewis-basic chelating groups versus amide nitrogen deprotonation and formation of metal-nitrogen bonds. Gas-phase models of metal-ion coordination can illuminate the factors governing this choice in condensed-phase proteins and enzymes. Here, structures of gas-phase complexes of Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) with tri- and tetra-peptide ligands are mapped out using a combination of Infrared Multiple Photon Dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy and density functional theory (DFT) computations. The two binding modes give distinctive IRMPD signatures, particularly in the diagnostic region 1500-1550 cm-1. Previous observations have suggested that Ni(ii) complexes preferentially show the iminol rearrangement pattern (Im) giving low-spin square-planar geometries with metal-ion bonds to deprotonated amide nitrogens. In contrast, alkaline earth metal ion complexes prefer amide carbonyl oxygens chelating the metal ion with pyramidal geometry (charge-solvation, CS). Surprisingly, it is shown here that the Gly4 complexes are CS bound, in contrast with the expectation of Im binding. It is suggested that CS binding is actually a normal Ni(ii) and Cu(ii) binding mode to simple peptides lacking participating side chains. Three factors are suggested to influence the choice between CS and Im binding patterns: (1) presence of an accessible side-chain Lewis-basic proton interaction site (FGGF, FGG and HAA complexes); (2) short chain length of the peptide leading to a shortage of accessible carbonyl oxygen sites for CS binding, (AAA, FGG and HAA complexes); (3) outright deprotonation of the ligand giving net negatively charged Im[Ni2+(Gly4-3H+)]- and Im[Ni2+(Ala3-3H+)]- complexes, which have a triply-deprotonated ligand. IRMPD spectra of [Cu2+Gly4]2+ and [Cu2+(Gly4-3H+)]- complexes suggest that their structures are similar to their Ni2+ analogs.
More Related Videos
11:38Quantifying the Binding Interactions Between CuII and Peptide Residues in the Presence and Absence of Chromophores
Published on: April 5, 2022
11:04Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry Techniques for Determining the Structure and Mechanisms of Metal Ion Recognition and Redox Activity of Metal Binding Oligopeptides
Published on: September 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Complexation Equilibria: The Chelate Effect
Complexation Equilibria: Factors Influencing Stability of Complexes
Valence Bond Theory
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Conjugated Proteins
Nucleoproteins are protein complexes that contain nucleic acids, categorized as deoxyribonucleoproteins (DNPs) or ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) respectively. The nucleosome is a typical example of a DNP where nuclear DNA is associated with histone proteins. The major antigen for the Covid-19 virus SARS-CoV is an RNP that is critical...
Coordination Compounds and Nomenclature