Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

17.9K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.9K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.9K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.9K
Observational Studies01:11

Observational Studies

11.3K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
11.3K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.5K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.5K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.5K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exploration of Regulatory Elements, MicroRNAs, and Copy Number Variation in Urogenital Chlamydia Reinfection in African American Women.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Age-Related Differences in Short Term Spatial Memory in Rhesus Macaques.

American journal of primatology·2026
Same author

Discovery of gene-alcohol interaction loci influencing blood pressure in 1.1 million individuals from multiple populations.

Research square·2026
Same author

Combinatorial immunotherapy drives exhaustion in tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells within the mouse renal tumor microenvironment.

Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)·2026
Same author

Bioenhancer Assessment of Black Pepper with Turmeric on Self-Reported Pain Ratings in Adults: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Clinical Trial.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Association between cagemate number and risk of death in mice: a time-varying covariate analysis using Cox frailty models.

GeroScience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K

Observational research rigour alone does not justify causal inference.

Keisuke Ejima1, Peng Li1,2, Daniel L Smith3,4,5

  • 1Office of Energetics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

European Journal of Clinical Investigation
|October 7, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Rigorous observational studies in mice suggest that associations found in nutrition research may not reliably indicate causation. Even well-controlled animal studies challenge the causal inference from observational data.

Keywords:
Causalitynutritional sciencesobservational studyrandomized controlled trialresearch design

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K
Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Nutrition Science
  • Animal Research
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Debate exists on the reliability of observational study associations as causal indicators.
  • The validity hinges on the study's control and execution rigor.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if rigorously controlled animal observational studies can reliably indicate causal effects.
  • To assess the trustworthiness of observational data in nutrition research.

Main Methods:

  • Two controlled animal observational studies were conducted.
  • Study 1: 332 mice (C57BL/6J) randomized into diet groups, measuring energy intake and lifespan.
  • Study 2: 60 mice (CD1) in paired groups to evaluate weight gain and food consumption association.

Main Results:

  • Study 1 showed a negative effect of energy intake on lifespan, but a positive association between food intake and lifespan in the ad libitum group.
  • Study 2 revealed a significant interaction between group assignment (randomized vs. self-selected) and food consumption on weight gain.

Conclusions:

  • Observational study associations in nutrition research may not be reliable indicators of causal effects.
  • Even highly rigorous study designs may not overcome limitations in inferring causation from observational data.