Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. Highly accurate...

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Improving public health and reducing health inequalities for people with learning disabilities.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2023

Same author

Hybrid immunity in older adults is associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 infections following BNT162b2 COVID-19 immunisation.

Communications medicine·2023

Same author

Change in direction on abuse.

Nursing older people·2016

Same author

Policy in practice accentuate the positive.

Nursing older people·2016

Same author

Expert support for dementia.

Nursing older people·2016

Same author

Policy in practice.

Nursing older people·2016

Same journal

Pressure ulcer healing in hospitalised older adults: a scoping review.

Nursing older people·2026

Same journal

Supporting effective shared decision-making with people with dementia.

Nursing older people·2026

Same journal

How to develop nursing student practice placement opportunities in care homes.

Nursing older people·2026

Same journal

Building resilience through adversity: exploring the experiences of older migrant women.

Nursing older people·2026

Same journal

Recognition and management of hearing loss in older adults in care homes.

Nursing older people·2026

Same journal

Performative empathy in dementia care: ethics and practice.

Nursing older people·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

One chance to get it right.

Deborah Sturdy¹

¹Older people, Department of Health.

Nursing Older People

|October 8, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This conference explored comorbidity and dying with dignity in palliative care. Experts discussed linking these complex issues to improve end-of-life care.

More Related Videos

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Acquisition of a High-precision Skilled Forelimb Reaching Task in Rats

Published on: June 22, 2015

Area of Science:

Palliative Care
Gerontology
Medical Ethics

Background:

The National Council for Palliative Care convened a conference to address critical issues in end-of-life care.
Focus areas included the challenges of managing comorbidity in patients nearing the end of life.
The concept of dying with dignity was a central theme, exploring patient autonomy and quality of life.

Purpose of the Study:

To synthesize expert discussions on comorbidity and dignified end-of-life experiences.
To identify key themes and challenges in palliative care related to complex patient conditions.
To foster a deeper understanding of patient-centered care at the end of life.

Main Methods:

The conference involved presentations and discussions from leading experts in palliative care.
The chair's role facilitated the integration of diverse perspectives.
Keynote speeches and panel sessions formed the core of the event.

Main Results:

Comorbidity significantly complicates the provision of dignified end-of-life care.
Effective palliative care requires integrated approaches to manage multiple health conditions.
Patient values and preferences are paramount in achieving a dignified death.

Conclusions:

Addressing comorbidity is essential for upholding dignity in dying.
Further research and integrated care models are needed to support patients with complex needs.
Promoting open communication about end-of-life wishes enhances patient dignity.