Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Clinical characteristics of anomalous correspondence
R P Rutstein1, K M Daum, J B Eskridge
1School of Optometry Medical Center, University of Alabama, Birmingham.
Abstract:
The correspondence status of 68 constant, early-age onset strabismics was evaluated with three common clinical tests to determine the prevalence of anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC) and which clinical features of the strabismus were most highly associated with the ARC. Ninety-six per cent, 71%, and 51% of the patients manifested ARC with the striated lens test, the synoptophore, and the afterimage test, respectively. The clinical features of the strabismus that were correlated, although weakly, with the diagnosis of ARC were: (1) the magnitude of the deviation at near for the striated lens test; (2) the age of the patient at the time of testing and the laterality of the deviation on the synoptophore; and (3) the age of the patient at the time of testing, the change in the deviation from distance to near, and the spherical equivalent refractive error for the afterimage test. A low correlation also existed between the age of the patient and the depth of ARC (superficial or deep-rooted). We conclude that the clinical features of strabismus cannot be utilized effectively to predict the status of retinal correspondence.
More Related Videos
05:52Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
Published on: November 21, 2013
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cause and Effect
Nonconscious Mimicry
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correspondence Bias
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect