Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.1K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.8K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.8K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.9K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

382
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
382
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

316
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
316

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diverging selection on body size in specialist terrestrial mammals.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Resource acquisition in diel cycles and the cost of growing quickly.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Revisiting the role of behavior-mediated structuring in the survival of populations in hostile environments.

Communications biology·2024
Same author

Bifurcation analysis of the predator-prey model with the Allee effect in the predator.

Journal of mathematical biology·2021
Same author

How does feedback from phage infections influence the evolution of phase variation in Campylobacter?

PLoS computational biology·2021
Same author

Searching for fat tails in CRISPR-Cas systems: Data analysis and mathematical modeling.

PLoS computational biology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K

Quantifying uncertainty in partially specified biological models: how can optimal control theory help us?

M W Adamson1, A Y Morozov2, O A Kuzenkov3

  • 1Department of Mathematics , University of Leicester , Leicester LE1 7RH , UK.

Proceedings. Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences
|October 8, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Mathematical models in biology face uncertainty due to simplified functions. This study introduces a new framework using optimal control theory to project function spaces, enabling robust uncertainty analysis in biological models.

Keywords:
bifurcation portraitpredator–prey modelpredictabilitysensitivity analysisstability

More Related Videos

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling
20:36

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling

Published on: July 4, 2007

9.2K
Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 14, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.7K
Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling
20:36

Predicting the Effectiveness of Population Replacement Strategy Using Mathematical Modeling

Published on: July 4, 2007

9.2K
Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline
10:44

Inherent Dynamics Visualizer, an Interactive Application for Evaluating and Visualizing Outputs from a Gene Regulatory Network Inference Pipeline

Published on: December 7, 2021

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Mathematical Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Systems Biology

Background:

  • Biological models are simplified representations with inherent uncertainty in function specification.
  • Structural sensitivity in models, where different functions yield varied predictions, critically impacts reliability.
  • Existing frameworks struggle to address uncertainty propagation from model functions to predictions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel framework for uncertainty analysis in biological models.
  • To address the challenge of projecting infinite-dimensional function spaces into lower dimensions using biological constraints.
  • To enable more flexible and user-friendly uncertainty quantification for biological models.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing partially specified models where functions are not rigidly defined.
  • Employing optimal control theory to construct functions that satisfy specified global properties.
  • Projecting function spaces while incorporating biological constraints to manage complexity.

Main Results:

  • Demonstration of a powerful technique for function space projection.
  • Successful application of optimal control theory for constructing biologically relevant functions.
  • Establishment of a method to handle uncertainty arising from model function specification.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework offers a flexible approach to uncertainty analysis in biological modeling.
  • Optimal control theory provides a viable solution for the projection challenge in partially specified models.
  • This method enhances the reliability and interpretability of predictions from complex biological models.