Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Pre-Implantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy on a Semiconductor Based Next-Generation Sequencing Platform
Published on: August 17, 2022
Structural Chromosomal Rearrangements Require Nucleotide-Level Resolution: Lessons from Next-Generation Sequencing in
Zehra Ordulu1, Tammy Kammin2, Harrison Brand3
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Next-generation sequencing precisely identifies balanced chromosomal rearrangements in prenatal diagnostics. Analyzing breakpoints within regulatory domains improves prediction of newborn outcomes, surpassing traditional methods like microarray and cfDNA screening.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Genomics
- Prenatal Diagnostics
Background:
- Next-generation sequencing enables precise detection of balanced chromosomal rearrangements in prenatal diagnostics.
- De novo balanced chromosomal rearrangements in newborns are linked to increased congenital abnormalities.
- Accurate interpretation of rearrangement breakpoints is crucial for predicting phenotypic outcomes and guiding perinatal care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of genomic sequencing in detecting and interpreting balanced chromosomal rearrangements in prenatal samples.
- To correlate sequencing findings of structural rearrangements with topological domains and gene regulation.
- To compare the diagnostic power of this molecular approach against standard methods like microarray and cfDNA screening.
Main Methods:
- Genomic sequencing was performed on ten prenatal subjects with balanced chromosomal rearrangements.
- Breakpoint locations were analyzed in relation to topologically associated domains (TADs).
- Results were compared with microarray analyses and clinical phenotypes.
Main Results:
- Sequencing identified rearrangements missed by microarray and cfDNA screening.
- Findings correlated with pregnancy outcomes: 5/10 with adverse outcomes, 3/10 with healthy newborns.
- Two cases were terminated before phenotype-genotype correlation could be established.
Conclusions:
- Clinical interpretation of structural rearrangements must include regulatory genomic domains, not just gene interruptions.
- This molecular approach provides superior information for genetic counseling compared to cfDNA and microarray.
- Integrating genomic sequencing enhances prenatal diagnosis and prediction of phenotypic outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Karyotyping
Karyotyping
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...

