Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy
Published on: November 13, 2016
Multisite reliability of MR-based functional connectivity
Stephanie Noble1, Dustin Scheinost2, Emily S Finn1
1Yale University, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract:
Recent years have witnessed an increasing number of multisite MRI functional connectivity (fcMRI) studies. While multisite studies provide an efficient way to accelerate data collection and increase sample sizes, especially for rare clinical populations, any effects of site or MRI scanner could ultimately limit power and weaken results. Little data exists on the stability of functional connectivity measurements across sites and sessions. In this study, we assess the influence of site and session on resting state functional connectivity measurements in a healthy cohort of traveling subjects (8 subjects scanned twice at each of 8 sites) scanned as part of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS). Reliability was investigated in three types of connectivity analyses: (1) seed-based connectivity with posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), right motor cortex (RMC), and left thalamus (LT) as seeds; (2) the intrinsic connectivity distribution (ICD), a voxel-wise connectivity measure; and (3) matrix connectivity, a whole-brain, atlas-based approach to assessing connectivity between nodes. Contributions to variability in connectivity due to subject, site, and day-of-scan were quantified and used to assess between-session (test-retest) reliability in accordance with Generalizability Theory. Overall, no major site, scanner manufacturer, or day-of-scan effects were found for the univariate connectivity analyses; instead, subject effects dominated relative to the other measured factors. However, summaries of voxel-wise connectivity were found to be sensitive to site and scanner manufacturer effects. For all connectivity measures, although subject variance was three times the site variance, the residual represented 60-80% of the variance, indicating that connectivity differed greatly from scan to scan independent of any of the measured factors (i.e., subject, site, and day-of-scan). Thus, for a single 5min scan, reliability across connectivity measures was poor (ICC=0.07-0.17), but increased with increasing scan duration (ICC=0.21-0.36 at 25min). The limited effects of site and scanner manufacturer support the use of multisite studies, such as NAPLS, as a viable means of collecting data on rare populations and increasing power in univariate functional connectivity studies. However, the results indicate that aggregation of fcMRI data across longer scan durations is necessary to increase the reliability of connectivity estimates at the single-subject level.
Insights
Multisite functional connectivity MRI studies show poor reliability with short scans. Longer scan durations are essential for dependable results, especially in rare clinical populations.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neuroimaging
- Psychiatry
Background:
- Multisite functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) studies accelerate data collection and increase sample sizes, particularly for rare clinical populations.
- However, variability introduced by different sites and MRI scanners can limit study power and weaken findings.
- Limited data exists on the stability of functional connectivity (FC) measurements across sites and sessions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the influence of site and session on resting-state FC measurements in healthy subjects.
- To quantify contributions to FC variability from subject, site, and day-of-scan.
- To evaluate between-session (test-retest) reliability using Generalizability Theory.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a traveling subjects design with 8 healthy subjects scanned twice at each of 8 sites (North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study - NAPLS).
- Investigated reliability using seed-based connectivity (PCC, RMC, LT), intrinsic connectivity distribution (ICD), and matrix connectivity.
- Quantified variance components to assess reliability across different FC measures and scan durations.
Main Results:
- Univariate FC analyses showed minimal site, scanner, or day-of-scan effects; subject effects were dominant.
- Voxel-wise FC summaries were sensitive to site and scanner manufacturer effects.
- Poor reliability (ICC=0.07-0.17) was observed for single 5-minute scans, increasing with scan duration (ICC=0.21-0.36 at 25min).
Conclusions:
- Limited site and scanner effects support multisite studies for rare populations and univariate FC research.
- High residual variance (60-80%) indicates significant scan-to-scan variability independent of measured factors.
- Aggregation of fcMRI data across longer scan durations is necessary to enhance single-subject FC reliability.

