Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

P-value01:10

P-value

9.2K
P-value is one of the most crucial concepts in statistics.
P-value stands for the probability value.  P-value is the probability that, if the null hypothesis is true, the results from another randomly selected sample will be as extreme or more extreme as the results obtained from the given sample.
A large P-value calculated from the data indicates to  not reject the null hypothesis. But a higher P-value does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the P-value, the more...
9.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

23.3K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
23.3K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

12.9K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
12.9K
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

13.6K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
13.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spaceflight and Fractures: 5-Year-Fracture Incidence Upon Return From Spaceflight.

Wilderness & environmental medicine·2026
Same author

A Comparative Analysis of Substance Use Disorder Programs Between Three Safety Sensitive Professions.

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment·2026
Same author

Trusted Sources: How Some US Employers Used Government Information During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same author

Real-World Effectiveness and Noninferiority Evaluation and Comparison of Messenger RNA-Based and Protein-Based COVID-19 Vaccines: Protocol for the BEEHIVE Randomized Study With a Hybrid Effectiveness Design.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

The Predictive Value of Cardiovascular Disease for Shoulder Injuries in a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2025
Same author

Monitoring outcomes of substance use disorder among healthcare professionals in Utah: A retrospective study of the professionals health program.

The American journal on addictions·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

18.4K

P value interpretations and considerations.

Matthew S Thiese1, Brenden Ronna1, Ulrike Ott1

  • 1Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family & Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, USA.

Journal of Thoracic Disease
|October 18, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Statistical significance in biomedical research, traditionally P<0.05, is evolving. Modern approaches consider trends and corrections, allowing P>0.05 for complex findings like effect modification.

Keywords:
95% confidence intervalBiostatisticsP valueodds ratio

More Related Videos

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease
09:39

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease

Published on: October 24, 2025

978
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

18.4K
Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease
09:39

Mapping Dysfunctional Protein-Protein Interactions in Disease

Published on: October 24, 2025

978
Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER
14:06

Detection of Rare Genomic Variants from Pooled Sequencing Using SPLINTER

Published on: June 23, 2012

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical research
  • Statistical analysis
  • Scientific methodology

Background:

  • Statistical evaluation is crucial for determining relationships in biomedical research.
  • The P value is a standard metric for statistical significance.
  • The conventional threshold of P<0.05 faces challenges due to sample size, bias, and error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the evolving interpretation of statistical significance in biomedical research.
  • To highlight the limitations of the traditional P<0.05 threshold.
  • To introduce modern statistical approaches for complex relationships.

Main Methods:

  • Review of statistical interpretation standards in biomedical research.
  • Analysis of the impact of sample size, bias, and random error on P values.
  • Examination of advanced statistical concepts including trend interpretation and correction factors.

Main Results:

  • The traditional P<0.05 threshold can be unreliable with small sample sizes or bias.
  • Statistical trends and correction factors are increasingly important for accurate interpretation.
  • Acceptance of statistical significance for P>0.05 is becoming necessary for complex relationships, such as effect modification.

Conclusions:

  • The interpretation of statistical significance in biomedical research requires a nuanced approach beyond the traditional P<0.05.
  • Modern statistical practices incorporate trend analysis and adjustments for multiple comparisons.
  • Flexible interpretation of P values, including P>0.05, is essential for understanding complex biological phenomena like effect modification.