Implementation of a Pediatric Emergency Triage System in Xiamen, China

Gang-Xi Lin1, Yin-Ling Yang2, Denise Kudirka3

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510515; Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361003, China.

Chinese Medical Journal
|October 18, 2016
PubMed

Insights

The new Chinese pediatric emergency triage system (CPETS) significantly improved patient care by reducing wait times and increasing triage accuracy. This enhanced system led to better efficiency in pediatric emergency rooms.

Area of Science:

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Healthcare Systems Analysis
  • Pediatric Care

Background:

  • Chinese pediatric emergency rooms (PERs) face overcrowding due to limited community healthcare access.
  • A new five-level Chinese Pediatric Emergency Triage System (CPETS) was developed, modeled after the Canadian Triage System and Acuity Scale.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical value and effectiveness of the CPETS in a Chinese hospital setting.
  • To compare the outcomes of the CPETS with the previous two-level triage system.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study design was used, analyzing data from before (control group) and after (experimental group) CPETS implementation.
  • Key metrics including patient flow, triage rates, triage accuracy, wait times (overall and for severe cases), and patient/family satisfaction were assessed.

Main Results:

  • CPETS implementation led to reduced patient flow, higher triage rates (93.40%), and improved triage accuracy (96.32%).
  • Wait times were significantly shorter for all patients (37.30 min vs. 41.60 min) and especially for severe cases (2.07 min vs. 3.23 min).
  • Family satisfaction rates increased to 94.23% with the CPETS.

Conclusions:

  • The CPETS enhances nurses' triage capabilities, enabling faster treatment for severe pediatric cases.
  • The system effectively redirects non-urgent patients, improving overall PER healthcare delivery efficiency.
Abstract