Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Lethal conflict after group fission in wild chimpanzees.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026

Same author

Host traits and environmental factors shape infection heterogeneity in wild rat-protozoa networks.

ISME communications·2026

Same author

Disentangling host genetic variation for avoidance and resistance to pathogens.

BMC biology·2026

Same author

<i>Leptospira</i> prevalence and lineages vary across land-use types due to shifts in small mammal communities.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026

Same author

Spreading potential in disease relevant networks: Predicting centralities in rural Northeast Madagascar.

PLOS global public health·2026

Same author

Surface and microstructural properties of denture base materials: Effects of manufacturing techniques, surface treatments, and aging protocols.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2026

Same journal

The Origins of Fashion.

Evolutionary anthropology·2026

Same journal

Silence as an Overlooked Catalyzer for Primate Vocal Evolution.

Evolutionary anthropology·2026

Same journal

Diversifying Methods in Evolutionary Anthropology: Autophotography as a Tool for Quasi-Naturalistic Observation of Human Behavior.

Evolutionary anthropology·2026

Same journal

Why Do Humans Exercise? A Neuro-Evolutionary Framework for Discretionary Physical Effort.

Evolutionary anthropology·2026

Same journal

Opaque Social Instruments: A Cultural Evolutionary Approach to Pleistocene Symbolic Artifacts.

Evolutionary anthropology·2026

Same journal

The Role and Consequences of Arranged Marriage in the Evolution of Human Mating.

Evolutionary anthropology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

Transparency, usability, and reproducibility: Guiding principles for improving comparative databases using primates

Carola Borries, Aaron A Sandel, Andreas Koenig

Evolutionary Anthropology

|October 19, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Improving data quality and accessibility is crucial for reproducible scientific studies. This involves clear data identification, metadata inclusion, reference documentation, and user-friendly interfaces for comparative analyses.

Keywords:

data provenance metadata primary sources procedure documentation user interaction

More Related Videos

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

Knowing What Counts: Unbiased Stereology in the Non-human Primate Brain

Knowing What Counts: Unbiased Stereology in the Non-human Primate Brain

Published on: May 14, 2009

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering

Published on: November 22, 2019

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Heuristic Mining of Hierarchical Genotypes and Accessory Genome Loci in Bacterial Populations

Published on: December 7, 2021

Knowing What Counts: Unbiased Stereology in the Non-human Primate Brain

Knowing What Counts: Unbiased Stereology in the Non-human Primate Brain

Published on: May 14, 2009

Area of Science:

Comparative biology
Data science in ecology

Background:

Advanced statistical methods are increasingly used to study interspecific variation.
However, the reliability of these analyses is often compromised by data of questionable origin, accuracy, and comparability.
This data variability has led to reduced reproducibility in scientific studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the challenges of data quality and reproducibility in comparative studies.
To propose a framework for enhancing the transparency, usability, and availability of comparative data.
To foster greater confidence in the findings derived from interspecific variation analyses.

Main Methods:

The authors convened to discuss strategies for improving comparative data.
A set of four guiding principles for data management and presentation were developed.
These principles focus on data identification, metadata, source documentation, and user interface design.

Main Results:

Four key principles were proposed to enhance data transparency and usability.
These include explicit data identification with operational definitions and method descriptions.
Inclusion of comprehensive metadata, documentation of data sources, and user-friendly interfaces are essential.

Conclusions:

Adoption of these proposed standards is urged for researchers, publishers, and funding agencies.
Implementing these principles will significantly increase the transparency, usability, and reproducibility of comparative studies.
This initiative aims to strengthen the foundation of scientific research relying on interspecific data.