Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity01:12

Measuring Acceleration Due to Gravity

1.4K
Consider a coffee mug hanging on a hook in a pantry. If the mug gets knocked, it oscillates back and forth like a pendulum until the oscillations die out.
A simple pendulum can be described as a point mass and a string. Meanwhile, a physical pendulum is any object whose oscillations are similar to a simple pendulum, but cannot be modeled as a point mass on a string because its mass is distributed over a larger area. The behavior of a physical pendulum can be modeled using the principles of...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: Breast cancer survivors' perspectives on a clinical decision tool to support individualized exercise prescriptions and discussions.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026
Same author

A Longitudinal Comprehensive Biospecimen and Clinical Data Repository for Cancer Early Detection: The InAdvance Study.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Enhanced dynamic risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma.

Nature medicine·2026
Same author

Obesity Accelerates Multiple Myeloma Progression in Certain Mouse Models and in Humans.

Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Message reactance as a mediator of effects of alcohol and cancer risk messages.

BMC public health·2026
Same author

Diagnostic Outcomes among Patients with Positive Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test Results.

Cancer research communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption
08:45

Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption

Published on: June 20, 2025

688

Comparison of Accelerometry Methods for Estimating Physical Activity.

Jacqueline Kerr1, Catherine R Marinac, Katherine Ellis

  • 11Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; 2Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA; 3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA; 4Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University Center for Geospatial Analytics, Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; 5Perelman School of Medicine and School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; 6Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA; 7Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; 8Departments of Environmental Health and Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; 9Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and 10National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
|October 19, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accelerometer placement and data processing significantly impact physical activity estimates. Researchers must standardize methods to ensure accurate comparisons across studies, as findings vary widely.

More Related Videos

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

13.1K
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption
08:45

Assessment of Physical Activity Intensity with Accelerometers and Oxygen Consumption

Published on: June 20, 2025

688
A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

13.1K
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Exercise Physiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of physical activity is crucial for health research.
  • Accelerometers are widely used but estimates can vary based on methodology.
  • Standardization is needed for reliable comparisons across studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare physical activity estimates derived from different accelerometer wear locations (hip vs. wrist).
  • To evaluate the impact of various data processing techniques (cut-points, vector magnitude, machine learning) on physical activity estimates.
  • To assess the influence of different wear time protocols on accelerometer-based physical activity data.

Main Methods:

  • Middle-aged to older women (N=321) wore accelerometers at the hip and wrist for 7 days.
  • Physical activity was processed using single-axis cut-points, raw vector magnitude thresholds, and machine learning algorithms.
  • Generalized estimating equations were used to compare daily estimates.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed across all techniques, wear locations, and protocols.
  • Mean daily physical activity estimates ranged from 22 to 67 minutes.
  • Machine learning on the hip identified 74% of participants meeting 150 min/week of walking/running, compared to 22% with cut-points.

Conclusions:

  • Physical activity estimates varied substantially (up to 52% across techniques, 41% across locations).
  • Researchers should exercise caution when comparing accelerometer data from different studies.
  • Standardization of accelerometry methods is essential for consistent and comparable physical activity research.