Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.7K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.7K
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

751
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
751
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pulling away from the trigger: the influences of purpose in life and self-affirmation on decisions to shoot.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

How to promote orderly access to medical care: an empirical analysis based on the Chinese experience.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Diverging Decisions? A Comparison of Jury Verdict Procedures.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Understanding Attorneys' Plea Advice: The Role of Defendant Guilt and Trial Penalties.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Words Matter: How Attorney Language Abstraction and Emotional Valence Shape Juror Decision-Making.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Distress Tolerance & Emotion Regulation as Potential Mediators Between Race-Based Traumatic Stress and Maladaptive Coping.

Journal of interpersonal violence·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K

The interrogation decision-making model: A general theoretical framework for confessions.

Yueran Yang1, Max Guyll2, Stephanie Madon2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Social Psychology Program, University of Nevada.

Law and Human Behavior
|October 21, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces the interrogation decision-making model to explain why suspects confess or deny guilt during police questioning. It uses expected utility theory to mathematically model these psychological processes over time.

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

9.1K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.7K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Criminology

Background:

  • Understanding suspect behavior during custodial interrogations is crucial.
  • Existing literature on confessions lacks a unifying theoretical framework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and detail the interrogation decision-making model.
  • To provide a theoretical framework for analyzing confession and denial decisions.
  • To explain the psychological mechanisms underlying these decisions.

Main Methods:

  • The study proposes a new theoretical model: the interrogation decision-making model.
  • It applies expected utility theory to mathematically represent decision-making processes.
  • It integrates findings from existing confession literature.

Main Results:

  • The model offers a mathematical account of confession decisions.
  • It explains how decisions to confess or deny guilt can change during an interrogation.
  • It provides a framework for organizing diverse effects within limited parameters.

Conclusions:

  • The interrogation decision-making model offers a comprehensive framework for understanding suspect behavior.
  • The model integrates psychological mechanisms and decision-making dynamics.
  • It advances the theoretical understanding of confessions in legal contexts.