A population-based study of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib in first line

Fausto Castagnetti1,2, Francesco Di Raimondo3, Antonio De Vivo1,2

  • 1Department of Oncology and Hematology, "S.Orsola-Malpighi" University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Insights

This study shows that imatinib as a first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) followed by second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) offers good survival rates and molecular response in real-world clinical practice. Older patients still experience positive outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Clinical trials for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) use strict inclusion-exclusion criteria, not reflecting real-life patient populations.
  • Treatment outcomes in CML depend on first-line, second-line, and third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies in clinical practice.
  • Real-world data is crucial for understanding the effectiveness of CML management strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the real-life response and outcomes of first-line imatinib treatment in newly diagnosed CML patients.
  • To assess the impact of switching to second-generation TKIs for unsatisfactory response or intolerance.
  • To analyze overall survival (OS), leukemia-related survival (LRS), and molecular response rates.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study of 236 newly diagnosed CML patients in two Italian regions, treated front-line with imatinib.
  • Analysis of patient data based on population-based criteria, including switches to second-generation TKIs.
  • Evaluation of molecular response (MR3.0, MR4.0), survival rates (OS, LRS), and cardiovascular complications.

Main Results:

  • A switch to second-generation TKIs occurred in 14% of patients due to side effects and 24% due to suboptimal response, improving molecular response in 57%.
  • Five-year OS and LRS were 85% and 93%, respectively; four-year MR3.0 and MR4.0 rates were 75% and 48%.
  • Cardiovascular complications were reported in 4% with imatinib alone and 6% with nilotinib as second-line; older age (≥70) impacted OS but not LRS.

Conclusions:

  • First-line imatinib followed by second-generation TKIs provides effective CML management in a real-life setting.
  • The study establishes an unbiased reference for TKI treatment outcomes in CML according to ELN recommendations.
  • Real-world data confirms the efficacy and safety of sequential TKI therapy in diverse CML patient populations.