Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Serological distance coefficients.

G W Hoffmann1, F Tufaro

  • 1Department of Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Immunology Letters
|August 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Erratum: Azimuthal Anisotropy of K_{S}^{0} and Λ+Λ[over ¯] Production at Midrapidity from Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s]_{NN}=130  GeV [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 132301 (2002)].

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Erratum: Azimuthal Anisotropy at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider: The First and Fourth Harmonics [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 062301 (2004)].

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Erratum: Observation of D^{0} Meson Nuclear Modifications in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=200  GeV [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 142301 (2014)].

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Beam Energy Dependence of Jet-Quenching Effects in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=7.7, 11.5, 14.5, 19.6, 27, 39, and 62.4 GeV.

Physical review letters·2018
Same author

Dijet imbalance measurements in Au+Au and pp collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=200  GeV at STAR.

Physical review letters·2017
Same author

Measurement of D^{0} Azimuthal Anisotropy at Midrapidity in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=200  GeV.

Physical review letters·2017
Same journal

The dendritic cell identity crisis: why conflicting classifications demand a consensus framework?

Immunology letters·2026
Same journal

The malignancy within: what cancer teaches us about human bonds.

Immunology letters·2026
Same journal

Progranulin enhances complement component 5a-primed neutrophil activation in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.

Immunology letters·2026
Same journal

The newly identified role of TRIM72, an E3 ligase, in NINJ1-mediated plasma membrane rupture: focus on its anti-inflammatory function.

Immunology letters·2026
Same journal

The subsets of circulating follicular helper T cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of Autoimmune thyroid diseases.

Immunology letters·2026
Same journal

Could bradykinin pathway inhibition change the course of severe hantavirus disease?

Immunology letters·2026
See all related articles

We introduce similarity coefficients to quantify how alike substances A and B are when tested with reagent C. This method can be applied to antibody mixtures for disease diagnosis and prognosis.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology and Biochemistry
  • Quantitative analysis of biological interactions

Background:

  • Assessing similarity between biological substances like antibodies is crucial for understanding immune responses.
  • Existing methods may lack context-specificity when evaluating complex biological mixtures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and introduce experimentally measurable similarity coefficients (S[A,B/C]) for substances A and B in the context of reagent C.
  • To propose a distance coefficient (D[A,B/C]) derived from the similarity coefficient.
  • To explore the application of these coefficients in analyzing antibody mixtures and their potential for disease diagnosis and prognosis.

Main Methods:

  • Definition of similarity coefficients (S[A,B/C]) based on experimental measurements.
  • Definition of a derived distance coefficient (D[A,B/C]) as 1 - S[A,B/C].

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of coefficients to antibody mixtures from serum samples.

    • Main Results:

    • Establishment of a framework for quantifying substance similarity within a specific reagent context.
    • Development of a distance metric complementary to the similarity coefficient.
    • Demonstration of applicability to complex biological samples like serum antibody mixtures.

    Conclusions:

    • The defined similarity and distance coefficients offer a novel approach to quantifying relationships between biological substances.
    • These coefficients have potential applications in medical diagnostics and prognostics, particularly in analyzing immune profiles.
    • Further experimental validation is needed to fully realize the clinical utility of these quantitative measures.