Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

04:32
Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
Published on: December 20, 2024
953
CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
Jeroen Pm Peters1, Alice van Zon1, Adriana L Smit1
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO BOX 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands ; Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
BMC Ear, Nose, and Throat Disorders
|May 23, 2015
Summary
This randomized controlled trial compares cochlear implantation (CI) with current treatments for single-sided deafness (SSD). Results will guide policy on CI cost-effectiveness for improving hearing and quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Otolaryngology
- Medical Technology
Background:
- Single-sided deafness (SSD) significantly impairs speech perception in noise, sound localization, and social interaction.
- Current treatments like Contralateral Routing of Sound (CROS) and Bone Conduction Devices (BCD) do not restore binaural hearing or significantly improve these deficits.
- Cochlear implantation (CI) presents a promising alternative for restoring binaural input and potentially overcoming SSD limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of cochlear implantation (CI) against current treatments (CROS and BCD) for single-sided deafness (SSD).
- To evaluate the impact of different treatment strategies on speech perception in noise, sound localization, tinnitus, and quality of life in SSD patients.
- To conduct an economic evaluation of CI versus CROS and BCD for SSD, informing health policy and reimbursement decisions.
Main Methods:
- A single-center Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) including 120 adult patients with SSD.
- Participants were randomized to undergo cochlear implantation (CI), or sequential treatment with Bone Conduction Devices (BCD) and Contralateral Routing of Sound (CROS).
- Outcomes including speech perception, sound localization, tinnitus, and quality of life were assessed over 60 months, alongside adverse event monitoring and economic evaluation.
Main Results:
- This section is not available in the provided abstract.
Conclusions:
- This RCT provides a direct comparison of CI with existing SSD treatments (CROS, BCD) across multiple health outcomes.
- The study will determine if the benefits of CI justify its higher cost compared to current modalities.
- Findings will inform health policy regarding the reimbursement of cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness.

