Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare...

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effectiveness of a Brief Educational Video on the Correct Placement of Automated Chest Compression Devices: A Prospective Study.

Cureus·2026

Same author

Correction: Effectiveness of a Brief Educational Video on the Correct Placement of Automated Chest Compression Devices: A Prospective Study.

Cureus·2026

Same author

Efficacy of sarolaner in Simparica<sup>®</sup> (sarolaner) chewables and Simparica Trio<sup>®</sup> (sarolaner, moxidectin, and pyrantel chewable tablets) against two US strains of Haemaphysalis longicornis.

Parasites & vectors·2026

Same author

Simparica Trio<sup>®</sup> kills Ctenocephalides felis on dogs and provides month-long protection against the transmission of Dipylidium caninum.

Parasites & vectors·2025

Same author

Efficacy of Revolution®Plus in cats for the prevention of Dipylidium caninum transmission by infected Ctenocephalides felis.

Parasites & vectors·2025

Same author

Implementing the Promotion in Place Model of Competency-Based Time-Variable Graduate Medical Education in Pathology.

Journal of graduate medical education·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Evaluating the Evaluators: Implementation of a Multi-Source Evaluation Program for Graduate Medical Education Program

Mary Ellen J Goldhamer, Keith Baker, Amy P Cohen

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

|October 26, 2016

Summary

This study developed a multi-source evaluation process for program directors (PDs), demonstrating its value and feasibility. The transferable tools showed high utility and led to planned improvements in residency programs.

More Related Videos

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Graduate Medical Education
Program Evaluation

Background:

Multi-source feedback is valuable for trainee assessment but not widely implemented for program directors (PDs).
Lack of standardized evaluation processes for PDs hinders professional development and program improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive multi-source evaluation system for program directors.
To assess the feasibility, utility, and impact of this novel evaluation process within a medical institution.

Main Methods:

Developed evaluation tools for PDs based on responsibilities and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements.
Collected feedback from trainees, department chairs, and graduate medical education (GME) leadership.
Assessed the process through follow-up surveys of PDs and chairs.

Main Results:

Achieved acceptable and improving completion rates for trainee, GME, and chair evaluations over four academic years.
Surveys indicated high utility of the evaluations, with many PDs and chairs receiving their first formal feedback.
Over 60% of PDs and chairs found trainee feedback highly useful, prompting planned changes in program management.

Conclusions:

Multi-source evaluation of PDs can be successfully implemented and sustained over time with good participation rates.
The developed process and tools are potentially transferable to other institutions for enhancing program director performance and quality improvement.