Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2025

DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens
Published on: February 1, 2020
Implementing the Promotion in Place Model of Competency-Based Time-Variable Graduate Medical Education in Pathology
Maria Martinez-Lage1, Mary Ellen J Goldhamer2, Martin V Pusic3
1is an Assistant Pathologist, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Assistant Professor of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, and Member, Pathology Review Committee, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract:
Background Promotion in Place (PIP) is a competency-based time-variable graduate medical education innovation model developed at Mass General Brigham and not previously tested for feasibility, acceptability, or outcomes. Objective To assess early PIP outcomes in the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) pathology residency program. Methods Approved by the American Board of Pathology, PIP was launched in 2021. The Clinical Competency Committee developed and implemented explicit graduation criteria. Trainees meeting criteria who chose early graduation became credentialed, board-eligible junior attendings at MGH in a period of "sheltered independence" and were assessed using the Focused Professional Practice Evaluation. PIP sheltered independence (PIP-SI) participation rates, time, and activities were followed. We also assessed board pass rates, Milestones, and patient safety reports for all residents. We measured additional participant time and resources. Results Over 4 years, 24 of 30 (80%) residents qualified for PIP-SI, 17 of 24 (71%) accepted, and 7 of 24 (29%) declined. Eleven of 17 (65%) had a period of sheltered independence as junior attendings (median 9 weeks [range 5-24 weeks]) in various anatomic and clinical pathology roles. Of 6 eligible residents not participating, 4 took a leave of absence, and 2 experienced licensing or visa delays. All residents passed their board examinations on the initial attempt and none had concerns identified through patient safety reports. Time and resource requirements were acceptable to stakeholders. Conclusions Most residents met criteria for PIP-SI and accepted, demonstrating high acceptability. PIP-SI was feasible with implementation into standard workflows over 4 years. PIP-SI attendings had no adverse outcomes identified.
More Related Videos
10:39Using Mouse Mammary Tumor Cells to Teach Core Biology Concepts: A Simple Lab Module
Published on: June 18, 2015
09:24Generation of Microtumors Using 3D Human Biogel Culture System and Patient-derived Glioblastoma Cells for Kinomic Profiling and Drug Response Testing
Published on: June 9, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...