Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 13, 2026

06:48
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
9.9K
Dynamic adjustment of lexical processing in the lexical decision task: Cross-trial sequence effects
David A Balota1, Andrew J Aschenbrenner1, Melvin J Yap2
1a Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences , Washington University in St. Louis , Louis , MO , USA.
Summary
Lingering effects from previous trials significantly influence current lexical processing. Participants cannot solely focus on the present stimulus, highlighting robust carry-over effects in lexical decision tasks.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Psycholinguistics
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Growing interest in dynamic changes within the lexical processing system across trials.
- Previous research often utilized linear mixed-effects modeling to assess these changes.
- Understanding trial-to-trial variability is crucial for accurate models of reading and word recognition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of previous trial lexicality and perceptual degradation on current trial processing.
- To examine the interaction between prior trial context and current stimulus properties.
- To provide empirical evidence for lingering effects in lexical decision tasks.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of three datasets, including two previously published studies and one new study.
- Utilized statistical modeling to assess interactions between trial variables.
- Examined effects of lexicality (word vs. nonword) and perceptual degradation (clear vs. degraded).
Main Results:
- Evidence for a robust four-way interaction among previous and current trial lexicality and degradation.
- Priming effects of relevant dimensions (clear/degraded, word/nonword) modulate current trial processing.
- Demonstrated significant carry-over effects from previous stimulus and response to the current trial.
Conclusions:
- Lexical decision tasks exhibit robust lingering effects from previous trials.
- Participants cannot fully isolate task systems to the current trial.
- Findings support the importance of on-line eye-tracking measures for studying word-level reading processes, as emphasized by Keith Rayner.

