Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 12, 2026

06:26
Quantitative Assessment Protocol for Facial Soft Tissue Volumetric Changes with Stereophotogrammetry
Published on: December 9, 2025
250
Soft tissue changes after a mandibular osteotomy for symmetric skeletal class III malocclusion
Seigo Ohba1, Haruka Kohara2, Takamitsu Koga3
1Department of Regenerative Oral Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8588, Japan. sohba@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
Odontology
|November 1, 2016
Summary
Orthognathic surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) significantly impacts soft tissue profiles. Understanding hard and soft tissue interactions is key for predicting esthetic outcomes in skeletal class III malocclusion patients.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Orthodontics
- Plastic Surgery
Background:
- The soft tissue profile is a critical determinant of esthetic outcomes following orthognathic surgery.
- Skeletal class III malocclusion often necessitates surgical intervention like sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) to correct mandibular prognathism.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate soft tissue profile changes in the subnasal and submental regions.
- To assess these changes more than one year after isolated sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO).
- To analyze the correlation between hard and soft tissue movements and their impact on facial esthetics.
Main Methods:
- Lateral cephalograms were obtained from 22 patients with mandibular prognathism before and after isolated SSRO.
- Soft and hard tissue landmarks were analyzed to quantify positional changes.
- Specific facial angles (labiomenton, stomions, naso-labial) were measured and correlated with skeletal and soft tissue displacements.
Main Results:
- Subnasal and submental soft tissues showed significant posterior movement relative to hard tissues (85-96%).
- Soft tissue B point and chin movements closely mirrored hard tissue displacement (96-99%).
- Changes in labiomenton, stomions, and naso-labial angles were influenced by skeletal movement and soft tissue width.
Conclusions:
- Soft tissue changes following SSRO are substantial and vary depending on the specific facial region.
- Accurate prediction of esthetic results requires consideration of the complex interplay between hard and soft tissues.
- Naso-labial angle modifications can occur even with isolated mandibular surgery, highlighting the importance of comprehensive analysis.

